2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web of Science and Scopus language coverage

Abstract: The evaluation of research outputs in the form of journal articles is important to help with monitoring performance and to allocate funds. Elsevier's Scopus and Clarivate's Web of Science (WoS) are the two main sources for identifying outputs. For non-English-speaking countries, it is especially important that most of the scientific activity evaluated is represented in the bibliometric database used. All documents published in Scopus and WoS during 2018 (6,094,079 documents) were therefore analysed and compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
1
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
100
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also biases in each of these citation databases, e.g., WoS has been criticized for favoring North American-based, English-language journals (Mongeon and Paul-Hus 2016 ). There are a few reasons for the predominance of documents in English, and apparent under-representation of Chinese: Scopus covers more Chinese-language documents than WoS, there are not many Chinese-language journals indexed in WoS, China has its own citation index (Chinese Science Citation Database) (Vera-Baceta et al 2019 ), and most publications of authors affiliated with Chinese institutions were published in English-language journals.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also biases in each of these citation databases, e.g., WoS has been criticized for favoring North American-based, English-language journals (Mongeon and Paul-Hus 2016 ). There are a few reasons for the predominance of documents in English, and apparent under-representation of Chinese: Scopus covers more Chinese-language documents than WoS, there are not many Chinese-language journals indexed in WoS, China has its own citation index (Chinese Science Citation Database) (Vera-Baceta et al 2019 ), and most publications of authors affiliated with Chinese institutions were published in English-language journals.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of influential world rankings pressure universities and researchers in many countries to aspire to publish in the dominant sources in order for their institutions to compete on the ranking scale. This devalues diverse research from non-dominant countries in the global south, non-English languages, indigenous and minority populations and in disciplines such as the humanities and political activist scholarship where the primary output format is not journal publications [6,7]. Even universities that explicitly refuse to participate in rankings continue to be included in their listings [8].…”
Section: Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our respondents were primarily drawn from the pool of published authors in the Scopus database. Some disciplinary domains are under-represented within Scopus, most notably the arts and humanities 38 , 39 . Subject indexing within Scopus occurs at the journal or source level.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%