2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web-based visualization for 3D data in archaeology: The ADS 3D viewer

Abstract: The solid geometry of archaeological deposits is fundamental to the interpretation of their chronological sequence. However, such stratigraphic sequences are generally viewed as static two-dimensional diagrammatic representations which are difficult to manipulate or to relate to real layers. The ADS 3D Viewer is a web-based resource for the management and analysis of archaeological data. The viewer was developed to take advantage of recent developments in web technology, namely the adoption of WebGL (Web Graph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest works include ADS (Archeology Data Service, U.K.) and ISTI-CNR, Italy, where archaeological dig reports, 3D surveying, 3D visualization on the web and the Harris formalism can be found in the same tool [44]. Indeed, the Harris formalism has been developed for archaeological excavation and a transposition on an upstanding structure, in a real 3D context, with stratigraphic units still functional at the time they were studied, which implies the development of many new issues to be considered, as well as an accurate formalism.…”
Section: Harris's Methods For the Temporal Representation Of Stratigrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest works include ADS (Archeology Data Service, U.K.) and ISTI-CNR, Italy, where archaeological dig reports, 3D surveying, 3D visualization on the web and the Harris formalism can be found in the same tool [44]. Indeed, the Harris formalism has been developed for archaeological excavation and a transposition on an upstanding structure, in a real 3D context, with stratigraphic units still functional at the time they were studied, which implies the development of many new issues to be considered, as well as an accurate formalism.…”
Section: Harris's Methods For the Temporal Representation Of Stratigrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, it is necessary to understand site formation processes when prospecting for submerged archaeological sites. This has been demonstrated in the Southern North Sea (Gaffney et al 2007) where 3D deep seismic survey gathered by the oil industry was used to model a vast submerged landscape which would have been occupied by Mesolithic Europeans. In researching a submerged archaeological site, the modern sea level imposes a division of the landscape that can interfere with the archaeologist's interpretation of that site.…”
Section: Beyond Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present the research in the field is wide-ranging and there exists a varied range of new generation web-platforms for CH data management available for end users, even open source, as advanced professional tools designed for operators working in the domain of cultural assets for supporting Cultural Heritage experts in their investigations. Recently developed applications are more or less flexible outside their scope, not all suitable for non-experts users, each one addressing particular needs and giving priority to various aspects: (i) ease of use by non-expert end users both for quick and simple annotation on 3D representations and disseminating analysis and research outcomes (Shi et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018); (ii) effective visualising methods and viewer platforms for 3D artefacts, complex 3D meshes and point clouds (Galeazzi et al, 2016); (iii) semantic-aware 3D representation for recording and integrating multidisciplinary observations of the conservation state into structural spatialised data (Carboni and De Luca, 2017;Messaoudi et al, 2018), tools for Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM) solutions by enabling semantic 3D data (Apollonio et al, 2017c) and relying on a computational ontology for Cultural Heritage domain modelling and ontology-based web platforms for managing extremely large amounts of information (Garozzo et al, 2017), semantic reality-based 3D digital models of architecture acquired by means of photogrammetric or TLS customised workflows used as documentation containers (Gaiani, 2015) and for hypothetical reconstructions of completely or partly missed architecture (Adembri et al, 2017), 3D environment to annotate textual, numerical or graphical information directly onto the high resolution 3D model (Soler et al, 2017;Apollonio et al, 2018b), Information Systems and advanced diagnostics tools to support restorers in their investigation (Apollonio et al, 2017b;Apollonio et al, 2018a). Another issue was a suitable retrieval system for stored information with relevance for the user and in the form more consistent with his own interests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%