Web-based support for daily functioning of people with mild intellectual disabilities or chronic psychiatric disorders: A feasibility study in routine practice

Wit, Jan-Maarten; Dozeman, Els; Ruwaard, Jeroen; Alblas, J.L. Blussé van Oud; Riper, Heleen

doi:10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.007

Cited by 23 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Technology for managing healthcare needs of people with intellectual disabilities, either in general ( Wilkie, 2010 ; Hall et al, 2011 ; van Dooren et al, 2013 ; Haymes et al, 2015 ) or associated to specific health needs, such as weight control ( Neumeier et al, 2017 ), or oral health ( O’Hara et al, 2008 ) are also included. In addition, two articles deal with telecare as a support tool for promoting independent living ( Taber-Doughty et al, 2010 ; de Wit et al, 2015 ), and one article shows the utility of videophones to improve communication ( Deverson et al, 2012 ). Finally, one study analyzes the applicability of technology for diagnosis purposes on intellectual disabilities ( Temple et al, 2010 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To answer the question about which e-health and e-therapy applications are being used with people with intellectual disabilities, we searched the PsycINFO, Medline, PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. This is an extensive search. Inclusion criteria were academic journals and any design type that addressed the topic of interest. Studies that do not include adults or elderly, and studies that do not focus on people with disabilities but on third parties, were excluded. After an initial selection of 515 articles, 32 full-text articles were subjected to in-depth analysis leading to the final selection of 18 articles. We used the AAID framework definition of intellectual disability to analyze the dimensions explored by the selected studies and found that the majority of studies focused on the use of technology as supports to instrumental activities of daily life. The ISO classification of assistive products allowed us to identify that many e-health products are aimed at providing psychological or medical treatment. In summary, this review suggests that there is a very small number of studies focusing on the use of technology by older persons with intellectual disabilities. The studies present substantial limitations regarding generalization and replication and pay little attention to the maintenance of cognitive abilities in this population. These aspects, together with premature aging generally associated with many conditions that lead to intellectual disability, underscore the need to pay more attention to and develop e-health interventions for cognitive stimulation for this group.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, concerning case studies, all conducted evaluation at the end of the intervention. Although several aspects of evaluation have been found in conceptual articles [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]41], the case studies mostly evaluated clinical [20,[42][43][44][46][47][48][49][52][53]55,[59][60][61][64][65], and human/social aspects [42,[46][47][48][49][53][54][55]59,61,63,65].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Until now, the use of technology in healthcare is driven mostly by the assumptions about the benefits of eHealth rather than the evidence of it. It is noticeable that the magnitude of evidence of effectiveness and efficiency of eHealth is not proportionate to the number of interventions that are regularly conducted. Reliable evidence generated through comprehensive evaluation of eHealth interventions may accelerate the growth of eHealth for long-term successful implementation and help to experience the benefits of eHealth in an enhanced way.

show abstract

“…Eighteen of these studies used evidence-based instructional practices to teach participants to use the eHealth application, such as a system of least prompting, most-to-least and least-to-most prompting, constant and progressive time delay prompting, and modellead test format (Ayres & Cihak, 2010;Ayres et al, 2009;Bereznak et al, 2012;Cavkaytar et al, 2017;Cullen, Alber-Morgan, et al, 2017;McMahon et al, 2015;Mechling & O'Brien, 2010;Mechling & Savidge, 2011;Price et al, 2018;Shepley et al, 2018;Smith et al, , 2016Spriggs et al, 2015;Stock et al, 2013;Van Laarhoven, Carreon, Bonneau, of these studies, those providing the intervention worked closely with participants, using modelling and guiding them until independent use was achieved (Campillo et al, 2014;Fage et al, 2018;Padgett, Strickland, & Coles, 2006). In addition, two of these studies used workshops with support staff to help participants become familiar with using the application (De Wit et al, 2015;Kerkhof et al, 2017). Furthermore, seven of these studies reported device training without giving additional details.…”

Section: Training In How To Use the Ehealth Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

eHealth in the support of people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review

Oudshoorn

Frielink

Nijs

et al. 2020

Research Intellect Disabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Around the world, increasing use is being made of health services and information delivered or enhanced over the Internet or related technologies, also referred to as eHealth (Eysenbach, 2001). This development may primarily be inspired by the potential of eHealth to improve the quality of the care provided while also upholding affordable care (Proudfoot et al., 2011). In addition, eHealth provides an opportunity for personalized, tailor-made, remote and on-demand support and treatment (

show abstract

Web-based support for daily functioning of people with mild intellectual disabilities or chronic psychiatric disorders: A feasibility study in routine practice

Cited by 23 publications

References 32 publications

E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review

E-Health Interventions for Adult and Aging Population With Intellectual Disability: A Review

Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

eHealth in the support of people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About