2022
DOI: 10.2196/33006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web-Based Skin Cancer Assessment and Classification Using Machine Learning and Mobile Computerized Adaptive Testing in a Rasch Model: Development Study

Abstract: Background Web-based computerized adaptive testing (CAT) implementation of the skin cancer (SC) risk scale could substantially reduce participant burden without compromising measurement precision. However, the CAT of SC classification has not been reported in academics thus far. Objective We aim to build a CAT-based model using machine learning to develop an app for automatic classification of SC to help patients assess the risk at an early stage. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If (e(θnδi)) is replaced with expxk=0(θn(δi+τk)), the variance for person n on item i adaptive to the RSM equals the result in Equation 6. [40] Through the Newton–Raphson iteration method [41] and the person estimate and SE(θ)true^ in Equations 1 and 5, RaschOnline [39] was programed and developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If (e(θnδi)) is replaced with expxk=0(θn(δi+τk)), the variance for person n on item i adaptive to the RSM equals the result in Equation 6. [40] Through the Newton–Raphson iteration method [41] and the person estimate and SE(θ)true^ in Equations 1 and 5, RaschOnline [39] was programed and developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If (e(θnδi)) is replaced with expk=0x(θn(δi+τk)), the variance for person n on item i adaptive to the RSM equals the result in Equation (6). [60] Through the Newton–Raphson iteration method [61] and the person estimate and SE(trueθ^) in Equations (1) and (5), RaschOnline [59] was programed and developed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If e (θn−δ i ) is replaced with exp x k=0 (θ n − (δ i + τ k )), the variance for person n on item i adaptive to the RSM equals the result in Equation ( 6). [60] Through the Newton-Raphson iteration method [61] and the person estimate and SE( θ) in Equations ( 1) and ( 5), RaschOnline [59] was programed and developed. Four visualizations in RaschOnline [59] were applied to present item features and person responses, including Wright Map [62] with groups, differential item functioning (DIF) [63] using forest plots, [64] item characteristic curves (ICCs), [65,66] and KIDMAP.…”
Section: Rasch Analysis Of Item Features and Person Responses Using R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2 popular ML models (i.e., CNN and ANN) have also been demonstrated separately in MS Excel. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Many researchers are familiar with the use of Microsoft Excel. Until now, no research has been conducted comparing model accuracy between the 2 ML models under the MS Excel environment, particularly when the modules and Equations are detailed in Supplemental Digital Contents, as we did in this research.…”
Section: Additional Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsoft Excel is a familiar program to many researchers. We are motivated to compare the accuracy of 2 popular ML models (i.e., convolutional neural networks, [CNN] and artificial neural networks [ANN]) that have been demonstrated in the literature, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] but with binary classes only. In general, CNN is considered to be a more powerful and accurate method of solving classification problems.…”
Section: Ml-based App For Predicting DCmentioning
confidence: 99%