Two approaches have been used to study the torsion effect on the fully developed laminar flow in a helical pipe of constant circular cross-section. The first approach is the series expansion method that perturbs the Poiseuille flow and is valid for low Dean numbers with both the dimensionless curvature and dimensionless torsion being much less than unity. The second is a numerical procedure that solves the complete Navier-Stokes equation and is applicable to intermediate values of the Dean number. The results obtained indicate that, as far as the secondary flow patterns are concerned, the presence of torsion can produce a large effect if the ratio of the curvature to the torsion is of order unity. In these cases the secondary flow, though still consisting of a pair of vortices, can be very much distorted. Under extreme conditions one vortex is so prevalent as to squeeze the second one into a narrow region. However, ordinarily the torsion effect is small and the secondary flow has the usual pattern of a pair of counter-rotating vortices of nearly equal strength. Concerning the flow resistance in the pipe the effect of torsion is always small in all the circumstances that have so far been considered.
A bifurcation study is made of laminar flow in curved ducts. The problem is formulated in a curvilinear coordinate system, and the governing equations, after orthogonal mapping is applied, are solved numerically by an iterative finite-difference method. Many computer runs were made with various duct cross-sections ranging from a circle to a square, to learn the transition of bifurcation structure with this change in cross-section and to reconcile the differences between them. In addition, a simpler technique is proposed to generate symmetric four-cell solutions in a circular pipe and a means is put forward to stabilize four-vortex structures in a complete cross-section.
Background: The application of large language models in clinical decision support (CDS) is an area that warrants further investigation. ChatGPT, a prominent large language models developed by OpenAI, has shown promising performance across various domains. However, there is limited research evaluating its use specifically in pediatric clinical decision-making. This study aimed to assess ChatGPT’s potential as a CDS tool in pediatrics by evCDSaluating its performance on 8 common clinical symptom prompts. Study objectives were to answer the 2 research questions: the ChatGPT’s overall grade in a range from A (high) to E (low) compared to a normal sample and the difference in assessment of ChatGPT between 2 pediatricians. Methods: We compared ChatGPT’s responses to 8 items related to clinical symptoms commonly encountered by pediatricians. Two pediatricians independently assessed the answers provided by ChatGPT in an open-ended format. The scoring system ranged from 0 to 100, which was then transformed into 5 ordinal categories. We simulated 300 virtual students with a normal distribution to provide scores on items based on Rasch rating scale model and their difficulties in a range between −2 to 2.5 logits. Two visual presentations (Wright map and KIDMAP) were generated to answer the 2 research questions outlined in the objectives of the study. Results: The 2 pediatricians’ assessments indicated that ChatGPT’s overall performance corresponded to a grade of C in a range from A to E, with average scores of −0.89 logits and 0.90 logits (=log odds), respectively. The assessments revealed a significant difference in performance between the 2 pediatricians (P < .05), with scores of −0.89 (SE = 0.37) and 0.90 (SE = 0.41) in log odds units (logits in Rasch analysis). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing ChatGPT as a CDS tool for patients presenting with common pediatric symptoms. The findings suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to enhance clinical workflow and aid in responsible clinical decision-making. Further exploration and refinement of ChatGPT’s capabilities in pediatric care can potentially contribute to improved healthcare outcomes and patient management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.