2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eij.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web-Based Applications quality factors: A survey and a proposed conceptual model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It defines a set of parameters with the objective of standardizing the evaluation of software quality, assuming a fundamental role in the evaluation of the quality of Web applications. According to ISO 9126, six quality characteristics should be offered by software applications [20] : (i) functionality, implementation of the functional requirements specified by the customer; (ii) reliability, capability of software to maintain its performance level under given conditions of time; (iii) usability, the ease with people employ a tool or use an application to perform a task; (iv) efficiency, the relationship between the level of performance of the software and the amount of resource used under stated conditions; (v) maintainability, the effort needed to make specified modifications; and (v) portability, the ability of the software to be transformed from one environment to another. In the context of this project the sub-categories of these six groups proposed by ISO 9126 were not being exhaustively addressed and tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It defines a set of parameters with the objective of standardizing the evaluation of software quality, assuming a fundamental role in the evaluation of the quality of Web applications. According to ISO 9126, six quality characteristics should be offered by software applications [20] : (i) functionality, implementation of the functional requirements specified by the customer; (ii) reliability, capability of software to maintain its performance level under given conditions of time; (iii) usability, the ease with people employ a tool or use an application to perform a task; (iv) efficiency, the relationship between the level of performance of the software and the amount of resource used under stated conditions; (v) maintainability, the effort needed to make specified modifications; and (v) portability, the ability of the software to be transformed from one environment to another. In the context of this project the sub-categories of these six groups proposed by ISO 9126 were not being exhaustively addressed and tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves improving and testing the content while comparing the results achieved with the content provider's expectation. Maintainability and portability [52] are two dimensions that play a vital role especially when involving internal quality factors. Finally, the Live phase assures the content is ready to be accessed by any MOOC users.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of a software artifact is a challenging task and requires incorporating both subjective and objective evaluation. But Researchers (Nabil et al, 2011) have found that a software artifact can be assured and measured when it is breakdown into measurable constructs [50]. According to the ISO standard on quality models (ISO/IEC 25010:2011), the main purpose of software quality evaluation is to provide quantitative reference for software products evaluation.…”
Section: Platform Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%