2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21817-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Technologies in Education: A Design Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the application of technology readiness models (TRMs) to measure physical education teachers’ perspectives on WBT, it is possible to identify conditions in infrastructure that better accommodate the use of technological innovations that improve physical education and performance [ 125 ]. Another study shows that teachers report benefits in the incorporation of WBT in teaching by receiving real-time feedback on students’ cognitive states and representing tools for the implementation of more dynamic studying sessions; however, students stated that they experience several challenges related to the affordability, technical infrastructure, distractibility, security, ethics, and privacy of these technologies [ 126 ]. Providing insights into the perspectives of the main stakeholders of these technologies would allow for their seamless adoption and implementation and would offer better performance results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the application of technology readiness models (TRMs) to measure physical education teachers’ perspectives on WBT, it is possible to identify conditions in infrastructure that better accommodate the use of technological innovations that improve physical education and performance [ 125 ]. Another study shows that teachers report benefits in the incorporation of WBT in teaching by receiving real-time feedback on students’ cognitive states and representing tools for the implementation of more dynamic studying sessions; however, students stated that they experience several challenges related to the affordability, technical infrastructure, distractibility, security, ethics, and privacy of these technologies [ 126 ]. Providing insights into the perspectives of the main stakeholders of these technologies would allow for their seamless adoption and implementation and would offer better performance results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some papers aspire both, for example, researchers have constructed different models to explore and discuss current mainstream technologies (Hernandez et al, 2014; Chen et al, 2017; Giannakos et al, 2020). A few papers (6%) reviewed other papers or presented a framework that laid the groundwork for data analysis (Henrie et al, 2015; Demir & Demir, 2018; Motti, 2019; de Arriba-Pérez et al, 2019). Figure 6 shows the reviewed literatures categorized according to their research objectives.
Figure 6.Number of publications by research objectives.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an IDC report, global shipments of wearable devices grew by 9.9% in the third quarter of 2021 [1]. Additionally, empirical data shows that wearable technology is thriving in consumer markets and gaining traction in the commercial sector [41][42]. Wearable IoT technology has been widely used in various applications, such as healthcare, security, location tracking, wellness, fitness, sports, gaming, and fashion [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%