2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear behaviour of cast and mushy state rolled Al–4.5Cu alloy and in-situ Al4.5Cu–5TiB2 composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very much similar to the results obtained earlier. 30) The above analysis indicates that the transition in wear debris size and morphology for the squeeze-cast alloy and composite can alter the wear mechanism in a significantly way. Figure 17 is a typical EDS analysis of wear debris of the gravity-cast composite generated at a normal load of 39.2 N. The EDS spectrum of the loose wear debris is the peaks of Al, Fe, O, Cu and Ti (Fig.…”
Section: Wear Surface and Debris Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is very much similar to the results obtained earlier. 30) The above analysis indicates that the transition in wear debris size and morphology for the squeeze-cast alloy and composite can alter the wear mechanism in a significantly way. Figure 17 is a typical EDS analysis of wear debris of the gravity-cast composite generated at a normal load of 39.2 N. The EDS spectrum of the loose wear debris is the peaks of Al, Fe, O, Cu and Ti (Fig.…”
Section: Wear Surface and Debris Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the case of the gravity-cast alloy, the extent of deformation is quite high during dry sliding wear due to lower hardness ( Fig. 13(a)), which causes the formation of two different types of cracks on the wear surface: one is formed by scratching ridgy alloy layers generated by micro-ploughing and deformation under frictional contact stress, 30,31) as shown in Fig. 14(a) A, B, C and D; the other is generated at the locations of casting defects such as shrinkage porosities and gas porosities of the worn alloy, and then propagated to the wear surface of the alloy under frictional contact stress, as indicated by Fig.…”
Section: Wear Surface and Debris Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important challenge in manufacturing of light weight and high strength aluminium parts is to produce near net shape components of complex geometry with desired properties meeting the requirements of automotive applications [1]. As a result, there is a considerable interest in aluminium based metal matrix composites (MMCs) due to their high specific strength and stiffness [3]. In-situ metal matrix composites in which reinforcement is generated within the alloy offers an advantage of clean interface with minimal interfacial reaction between reinforcement and matrix [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ metal matrix composites in which reinforcement is generated within the alloy offers an advantage of clean interface with minimal interfacial reaction between reinforcement and matrix [4] [5]. Amongst many types of reinforcements used [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], TiB 2 reinforcement in aluminium alloys using salt based insitu methods offers great advantages such as minimal reactivity [7], clean interface [14], sound thermal conductivity [15] and high elastic modulus and hardness [16]. TiB 2 particles acts as a heterogeneous nucleating site for α-Al [11] controlling the grain size, thereby improves the mechanical properties of the Al matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%