2016
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-06-2014-0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear behavior of FDM parts fabricated by composite material feed stock filament

Abstract: Purpose In this study the friction and wear behavior of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts fabricated with composite material and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material feedstock filament were realized and compared under dry sliding conditions. Design/methodology/approach The tests were performed by applying the load of 5, 10, 15 and 20 N with sliding velocity of 0.63 m/s for the duration of 5 and 10 min at room temperature. Findings The results highlight various wear mechanisms such as adhesion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that composite material has less coefficient of friction as compared to pure ABS material. This result with an agreement other finding (Garg and Singh, 2015;Xu et al, 2010;Singh Boparai et al, 2016;Srinivas et al, 2012). The coefficient of friction initially has a higher value because of high resistance faced by pin when sliding on fresh abrasive surface and it becomes steady as the test continues (Singh Boparai et al, 2016).…”
Section: Friction Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that composite material has less coefficient of friction as compared to pure ABS material. This result with an agreement other finding (Garg and Singh, 2015;Xu et al, 2010;Singh Boparai et al, 2016;Srinivas et al, 2012). The coefficient of friction initially has a higher value because of high resistance faced by pin when sliding on fresh abrasive surface and it becomes steady as the test continues (Singh Boparai et al, 2016).…”
Section: Friction Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This result with an agreement other finding (Garg and Singh, 2015;Xu et al, 2010;Singh Boparai et al, 2016;Srinivas et al, 2012). The coefficient of friction initially has a higher value because of high resistance faced by pin when sliding on fresh abrasive surface and it becomes steady as the test continues (Singh Boparai et al, 2016). This result indicates that the parts produced by FDM have asperities which get surfaced out, and after sometime, as the asperities are smoothened, the coefficient of friction decreases and becomes stable as much of material is worn out in the form of powder.…”
Section: Friction Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The experimental stand designed and realized by the authors aims to check the wear of the gearwheels (the tooth profile, the bottom land, the state of the gear surfaces) obtained by additive technologies [7][8][9]. The stand is 1:1 using a JGA 25-370 -6V gearmotor with 58 rpm as the power source, the drive wheel is made using FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) technology and the OLC 50 driven wheel.…”
Section: Fig 4 Microscopic Investigations Of 3d Printed Gearwheelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ainda sobre o comportamento de desgaste de peças produzidas por FDM submetidas a desgaste deslizante, em outro estudo Boparai et al (2016) mostrou que os mecanismos de desgaste que ocorrem em peças de ABS são adesão e fadiga.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified