2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wealth-Based Trust and the Development of Collective Action

Abstract: Interpersonal trust is one possible mechanism by which wealth inequality affects the success of efforts in cooperation. Specifically, the presence of perceived economic differences between members of small agricultural cooperatives in northwest Ecuador's agricultural frontier encourages trust in the wealthy, thus facilitating coop development during the initial stage of cooperative formation. But, such inequality and exclusive trust may later negatively affect coop success. These generalizations are only possi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The willingness of a Riverina export grower to undertake some QFly management activities on his neighbours' land if area-wide management eliminate the need for cold sterilisation confirms findings elsewhere. That is, wealthy members sometimes accept a disproportionate economic responsibility to ensure the success of collective action provided the benefit they gain from it justifies their actions (Jones 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The willingness of a Riverina export grower to undertake some QFly management activities on his neighbours' land if area-wide management eliminate the need for cold sterilisation confirms findings elsewhere. That is, wealthy members sometimes accept a disproportionate economic responsibility to ensure the success of collective action provided the benefit they gain from it justifies their actions (Jones 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration can take the form of inclusion in planning committees and local cooperatives, thus going beyond existing leadership to select representatives from the less-represented groups and individuals in resettlement communities. Leadership by less wealthy members is one way to maintain mutually beneficial collective action even when resource distribution may be numerically unequal (Jones 2004). Potentially adaptive innovations in culture and social practice, such as new production techniques and cooperation with outside groups or institutions, can be fostered by connecting labourers and agricultural producers to each other and to related economic and agricultural initiatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that do emerge are often looking at higher tier organizations, such as cooperatives or agribusiness enterprises. For example, Jones (2004) shows how interpersonal trust and wealth heterogeneity among cooperative members were enabling conditions for the success of the cooperative, especially during the first stages of cooperative formation. Johnson, Suarez, and Lundy (2002) show how social capital, as expressed through business firm relationships, contributed positively to firm productivity and performance.…”
Section: Collective Action and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%