2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:anam.0000033225.98714.4b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak type inequalities for the Walsh and bounded Ciesielski systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We may suppose that 0 < < 1 since the case = 1 was proved in Weisz [18]. As the operators * and , * are bounded on L ∞ (see [16,17]), we have to prove (1).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We may suppose that 0 < < 1 since the case = 1 was proved in Weisz [18]. As the operators * and , * are bounded on L ∞ (see [16,17]), we have to prove (1).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the endpoint case p = 1/( + 1) Weisz obtained in [18] for the Fejér means that 1 * is bounded from H 1/2 to the weak L 1/2 . Simon [10] gave a counterexample which shows that 1 * is not bounded from H p to L p if 0 < p < 1 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The counterexample for p = 1/2 due to Goginava [6], (see also [3] and [10]). Weisz [25] proved that σ * is bounded from the Hardy space…”
Section: The Concept Of Modulus Of Continuity In Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counterexample for p = 1/2 due to Goginava [7], (see also [1] and [20]). Weisz [28] proved that σ * is bounded from the Hardy space H 1/2 to the space L 1/2,∞ . The second author [21,22] proved that the following is true: Theorem T1.…”
Section: This Theorem Implies Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%