2014
DOI: 10.1515/gmj-2014-0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the norm convergence by Vilenkin–Fejér means

Abstract: The main aim of this paper is to nd necessary and su cient conditions for the convergence of Fejér means in terms of the modulus of continuity on the Hardy spaces when 0 < ≤ 1 2 .

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author [14] proved that if F ∈ H p (0 < p < 1/2) and ω Hp (1/2 n , F ) = o 1/2 n(1/p−2) , as n → ∞, then (3) σ n F − F p → 0, when n → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The author [14] proved that if F ∈ H p (0 < p < 1/2) and ω Hp (1/2 n , F ) = o 1/2 n(1/p−2) , as n → ∞, then (3) σ n F − F p → 0, when n → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author [14] also consider endpoint case p = 1/2 and proved that if F ∈ H 1/2 and (4) ω H 1/2 (1/2 n , F ) = o 1/n 2 , as n → ∞, then σ n F − F 1/2 → 0, when n → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3 we study the rate of the deviant behaviour of the -th Marcinkiewicz mean. Next, as an application, following ideas of [26] for one-dimensional Fejér means (see conditions (1) and (2)), we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of Walsh-Marcinkiewicz means in terms of modulus of continuity on H (G 2 ), Section 4. With the aid of some useful inequalities given in the proof of our main theorem, in Section 5 we prove a strong convergence theorem for Marcinkiewicz means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason of the divergence of S Mn+1 f is that when 0 < p < 1 the Fourier coefficients of f ∈ H p are not uniformly bounded (see Tephnadze [145]). On the other hand, there exists an absolute constant c p , depending only on p, such that…”
Section: January 31 2022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of next Lemma can be found in Tephnadze [145]: Lemma 4.4 Let x ∈ I s \I s+1 , s = 0, ..., N − 1. Then…”
Section: Auxiliary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%