2011
DOI: 10.1177/1350507611429911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weak knowledge for strengthening competences: A practice-based approach in assessment management

Abstract: The aim of this article is to demonstrate the importance of local knowledge for the design of assessment tools intended to develop and enhance human resources in organizations. With respect to the standardization of assessment procedures brought about by the application of universal and global reference models, the article uses a case study to illustrate the potentialities and shortcomings of using a local approach. After a brief survey of the main theoretical frames of reference, the article describes how loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this line, it is verified in Ripamonti and Scaratti (2011) that the information established by the model for performance evaluation focused on competencies are more useful to the organization when compared with those obtained using other models, because they highlight the ability of delivery of each professional and his or her growth potential.…”
Section: Competencies Managementmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this line, it is verified in Ripamonti and Scaratti (2011) that the information established by the model for performance evaluation focused on competencies are more useful to the organization when compared with those obtained using other models, because they highlight the ability of delivery of each professional and his or her growth potential.…”
Section: Competencies Managementmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Regarding the performance evaluation practices, in companies X and W the unidirectional model adopted, in which only the immediate manager evaluates each employee, while at company Z the 360º model was adopted, which has multiple evaluative sources. Although in all cases there is an evaluation model capable of mapping out the individuals' evolution regarding the competencies valued by the organizations, as recommended by Gorlov, Lazareva and Fursov (2015), Rosa et al (2015), Ripamonti and Scaratti (2011) and Brandão et al (2008), only one of the companies analyzed adopts the 360º method , pointed out by Brandão et al (2008) as an alternative to reduce the bias associated with unidirectional methods.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ripamonti and Scaratti (2002) demonstrate the importance of the standardization of assessment procedures for the design of assessment tools intended to develop and enhance human resources in organizations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers' contextual knowledge of transshipment ports from previous studies (Ripamonti and Scaratti, 2012) is also used to increase our understanding of practice in this study. Observation was conducted by two researchers seven times in 8-hour sessions during all shifts over a period of two weeks.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Safety Practicementioning
confidence: 99%