2008
DOI: 10.1177/006996670804200302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘We work together, we eat together’

Abstract: Among themselves and within their families, workers of a public sector power project in Orissa, constantly and intentionally, violate the restrictions on inter-caste contact that they perceive as prevailing in their various villages of origin. Subscribing to the teleology of modernisation, the workers dichotomise the industrial settlement and the village as ‘modern’ and ‘backward’ sites, respectively. Their withdrawal into these ‘backward’ villages for weddings and other rituals is explained with reference to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He makes this observation in relation to the development of egalitarian ideology among plantation workers based on "equality of men on the basis of human-ness" (ibid: 414). The importance of egalitarian relations and solidarity within the working class in the stratified class order of the agrarian capitalist/industrial system has been ethnographically captured by anthropologists in various contexts (Jayawardena, 1963(Jayawardena, , 1968, in the case of British Guyanese plantations; Mayer, 1961, in Fijian Plantations;Parry, 1999, andStrümpell, 2008, in industrial settings in central India). Among South Asian plantation workers, a particular moral egalitarian society was a major factor in mediating the capitalist system of tea production which was organized around a specific sexual division of labour (For Sri Lankan Plantations, see Daniel, 1996;Jayawardena & Kurian, 2015;Philips, 2005; For northeast Indian plantations, see Chatterjee, 2001;Chaudhuri, 2013;Besky, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He makes this observation in relation to the development of egalitarian ideology among plantation workers based on "equality of men on the basis of human-ness" (ibid: 414). The importance of egalitarian relations and solidarity within the working class in the stratified class order of the agrarian capitalist/industrial system has been ethnographically captured by anthropologists in various contexts (Jayawardena, 1963(Jayawardena, , 1968, in the case of British Guyanese plantations; Mayer, 1961, in Fijian Plantations;Parry, 1999, andStrümpell, 2008, in industrial settings in central India). Among South Asian plantation workers, a particular moral egalitarian society was a major factor in mediating the capitalist system of tea production which was organized around a specific sexual division of labour (For Sri Lankan Plantations, see Daniel, 1996;Jayawardena & Kurian, 2015;Philips, 2005; For northeast Indian plantations, see Chatterjee, 2001;Chaudhuri, 2013;Besky, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the context is quite different from the public sector dam in Orissa where Strümpell did his research (2008), the situation of conviviality, a state of temporary loosening of caste commensality, which does not imply a modification of caste‐based rules back in the village, is to a certain extent comparable in the Madhya Pradesh construction yards with what Strümpell observes in the public sector (Strümpell, 2008). As he states, the question of commensality is after all a question of exterior judgement by the family and the caste, and this is one of the reasons why, according to him, conviviality is so strong in the settlements he observes: The family and the caste fellows from the village almost never visit their fellows at the settlement.…”
Section: Spaces Of Convivialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these regards, the situation here is comparable to the inter‐caste conviviality that Strümpell (2008) observes but to a lesser degree, as Strümpell finds that invitations are given to attend weddings between castes with different statuses in the migrants' village of origin, which certainly did not happen among the construction yard workers, where families were never involved in these inter‐communitarian exchanges. This is limiting the range of the relativization of the caste discrimination practised in the construction yards because, as women are seen as the bearers of caste purity, it has less consequences in terms of collective purity to make these arrangements in a context where they are not involved.…”
Section: Spaces Of Convivialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations