2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2116-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“We shall count it as a part of kyogero”: acceptability and considerations for scale up of single dose chlorhexidine for umbilical cord care in Central Uganda

Abstract: BackgroundCleansing the umbilical cord with chlorhexidine reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in communities where newborn deaths and home births are common. As a result, the World Health Organization and national authorities are advocating the scale up of this intervention. In order for such a scale up to be effective, it has to be acceptable to the targeted population. With the overall aim to clarify conditions for scale-up, this study explored the acceptability of single dose chlorhexidin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The randomised controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidine use for umbilical cord care in the prevention of severe illnesses among newborns [23]. This formative study had two components: the first, reported in this paper, explored meanings and practices related to the umbilical cord; the other which investigated the acceptability of chlorhexidine for umbilical cord care, has been published elsewhere [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The randomised controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidine use for umbilical cord care in the prevention of severe illnesses among newborns [23]. This formative study had two components: the first, reported in this paper, explored meanings and practices related to the umbilical cord; the other which investigated the acceptability of chlorhexidine for umbilical cord care, has been published elsewhere [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 Mukunya et al suggested that social and cultural dimensions of acceptability are undervalued currently in the TFA. 30 Our study has also contributed to the development of the TFA, recommending the TFA findings be presented in a more dynamic model to illustrate interconnectedness and significance of constructs for the proposed intervention (see Figure 1 ). As only two of the original 43 reviews used to develop the TFA were qualitative reviews, 15 future qualitative studies will have an important role in providing and then assessing new insights on acceptability domains and adding to the model as it is used in wider contexts and settings.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The TFA is fast gaining recognition in health research and has been used throughout studies in different ways, including: to highlight how their findings were in line with TFA constructs 19 25 ; in aspects of study design or analysis 26 30 ; and in protocol papers outlining how they will use the TFA in future. 31 34 Unlike this study, Nadarzynski et al 27 used the TFA to inform questions on a topic guide about acceptability of artificial intelligence led chatbox services; however, they did not analyse the data using the TFA.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptability usually looks at the introduction of a new device/technology 15,38,39 or innovative ways to improve service delivery. [40][41][42][43] Acceptability assessment can take place 'before' the implementation of the healthcare intervention; during the intervention period, 'concurrent assessment, ' or after the implementation, 'post-intervention. ' 22,23 The present study has been done after implementation of Jazia PVS as a 'post-intervention assessment.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%