Ways of Improving Blast Furnace Smelting Efficiency with Injection of Coal-Dust Fuel and Natural Gas

Курунов, И. Ф.

doi:10.1007/s11015-018-0557-6

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As part of the iron and steel industry, the ironmaking system produces about 70% of the total CO 2 emissions of steel [ 3 ]. In order to reduce CO 2 emissions from the ironmaking system, researchers have successively proposed a series of low-carbon ironmaking solutions based on hydrogen reduction, such as blast-furnace injection of hydrogen-bearing materials, coal-dust fuel and natural gas, the “Ultra-Low CO 2 Steelmaking” (ULCOS) emissions project, and “CO 2 ultimate reduction in steel-making process by innovative technology for cool Earth 50” (COURSE 50) [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metallurgical Coke Combustion with Different Reactivity under Nonisothermal Conditions: A Kinetic Study

Qin

Ling

et al. 2022

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The combustion characteristics and kinetics of high- and low-reactivity metallurgical cokes in an air atmosphere were studied by thermogravimetric instrument. The Coats–Redfern, FWO, and Vyazovkin integral methods were used to analyze the kinetics of the cokes, and the kinetic parameters of high- and low-reactivity metallurgical cokes were compared. The results show that the heating rate affected the comprehensive combustion index and combustion reaction temperature range of the cokes. The ignition temperature, burnout temperature, combustion characteristics, and maximum weight-loss rate of low-reactivity coke (L-Coke) were better than high-reactivity coke (H-Coke). Low-reactivity coke had better thermal stability and combustion characteristics. At the same time, it was calculated via three kinetic analysis methods that the combustion activation energy gradually decreased with the progress of the reaction. The coke combustion activation energy calculated by the Coats–Redfern method was larger than the coke combustion activation energy calculated by the FWO and Vyazovkin methods, but the laws were consistent. The activation energy of L-Coke was about 4~8 kJ/mol more than that of H-Coke.

show abstract