2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ways and Benefits of Closing the Gap: Aligning Language and Communication Teaching with the Technical Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accreditation bodies and professional organizations across different continents have repeatedly stipulated that engineering graduates should be able to collaborate within diverse teams in international contexts, communicate with engineers and non-engineers alike, and make informed judgments that take in the impact of engineering solutions in global, ethical, societal contexts (ABET, 2019;EURANEE, 2015;FEIAP, 2010FEIAP, /2018. The path to implement these desirable learning outcomes in the engineering curriculum, however, has not been smooth (Kjellgren, 2020;Van Maele & Vassilicos, 2015). Even in places where educational interventions have been implemented to promote such outcomes, they have largely been informed by an essentialist approach rather than by a culture-as-construct perspective that prioritizes small cultures and interpretivist understanding (Handford et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accreditation bodies and professional organizations across different continents have repeatedly stipulated that engineering graduates should be able to collaborate within diverse teams in international contexts, communicate with engineers and non-engineers alike, and make informed judgments that take in the impact of engineering solutions in global, ethical, societal contexts (ABET, 2019;EURANEE, 2015;FEIAP, 2010FEIAP, /2018. The path to implement these desirable learning outcomes in the engineering curriculum, however, has not been smooth (Kjellgren, 2020;Van Maele & Vassilicos, 2015). Even in places where educational interventions have been implemented to promote such outcomes, they have largely been informed by an essentialist approach rather than by a culture-as-construct perspective that prioritizes small cultures and interpretivist understanding (Handford et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%