Wavelength dependence of aerosol optical thickness in the UV‐B band

Abstract

[1] The optical thickness of the atmosphere, t at , was deduced from measurements of narrowband direct solar UV-B (280 -320 nm) radiation. This is the radiation that is strongly absorbed in the stratosphere by ozone, especially near the lower limit wavelength of these measurements, 306.3 nm. Measurement campaigns were organized to obtain radiation data at different sites, for different kinds of aerosol, using the same methods and instruments, in order to deduce the atmospheric optical thickness for different atmospheric conditions. The measurements were made with a Brewer spectrophotometer at each site. This instrument measures also the atmospheric ozone and sulphur dioxide columns, and therefore it is possible to deduce the aerosol optical thickness, t ae . The possibility of additional absorptions in the UV-B band, especially formaldehydes, is investigated. Two data sets are examined: C. Grande and S. Paulo. A large percentage of the data show that the wavelength dependence of the aerosol optical thickness is one that appears to increase with wavelength. In other words, the difference between the absolute values at 320.1 and 306.3 nm, is positive for the majority of cases. However, this difference is not always larger than the uncertainty/error of the measurement. This intriguing result opposes the Angstrom law, applicable to a much larger dynamic range in wavelength. For the C. Grande data (with generally larger values of optical thickness), the difference is positive in 16 out of 19 cases, but there are only 4 cases when the difference is larger than the error. For the S. Paulo morning data, however, the opposite is true. The difference is positive with only one exception, and there are 13 cases out of 17 where the difference is larger than the error.

L׳ADROIT – A spaceborne ultraviolet laser system for space debris clearing

“…Lower fluence on target corresponds to lower laser pulse energy required from the laser. Further, atmospheric attenuation at 355 nm is 0.3/km [13], so that transmission on a tangent path to Earth from space is only 2.5E-9, preventing eye injuries on the ground. This choice also gives low background illumination and dark, absorptive targets.…”

Aerosol Optical Depth and the Global Brewer Network: A Study Using U.K.- and Malaysia-Based Brewer Spectrophotometers

“…Nonetheless, a was determined in the UV wavelength range by using AOD obtained from LPM at Ispra, Italy, and El Arenosillo, Huelva, Spain (de la Casinière et al 2005;Grö bner and Meleti 2004;Meleti and Cappellani 2000), with a positive a retrieval. In contrast, negative values of a have been observed by others (Cachorro et al 1989;Jacovides et al 2000;Kirchhoff et al 2002;Marenco et al 1997;Silva and Kirchhoff 2005). According to Mie scattering theory, a negative a would require a very large mean radius of aerosol particle and a large real part of the refractive index (Arola and Koskela 2004), which is not realistic for urban aerosol, implying that extracting a from the limited Brewer wavelength range is sometimes beyond the capabilities of the instrument and conditions.…”

An improved estimation of daily clear-sky biologically EER from broadband global solar radiation

“…In outer space, UV radiation accounts for only about 8% of the total solar radiation (e.g., Sabziparvar 2000), while at any location on the earth's surface, the UV radiation value depends on many factors. Absorption by ozone, atmospheric attenuation processes (e.g., aerosols and trace gases), UV surface albedo, the air mass traversed by the direct solar beam (which depends on the solar zenith angle), sun-earth distance, and the altitude of observational site are some of the factors that contribute to change in the surface UV under clear sky conditions (e.g., Kylling et al 2000;Kirchhoff et al 2002;Luccini et al 2003).…”