2006
DOI: 10.1364/oe.14.006986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave optics simulation approach for partial spatially coherent beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the corresponding numerical intensity to the Figure 2 after propagating a distance at z = 35µm. The results indicate that the stronger decoherence (smaller τ ) of the light causes more a intense scattering along the propagation and shows comparable conclusion from the Gaussian Schell model [28].…”
Section: Figure 2 Illustrates the Intensity Patternssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 3 shows the corresponding numerical intensity to the Figure 2 after propagating a distance at z = 35µm. The results indicate that the stronger decoherence (smaller τ ) of the light causes more a intense scattering along the propagation and shows comparable conclusion from the Gaussian Schell model [28].…”
Section: Figure 2 Illustrates the Intensity Patternssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[27][28][29] Specifically, the implementation procedure can be described as follows: (1) generate a random phase screen with appropriate spatial coherence length l c ; 29 (2) apply the phase screen to a coherent beam in the source plane; (3) numerically "propagate" the beam to the observation plane 28 through a separate set of phase screens that model atmospheric turbulence and compute the intensity; and (4) repeat steps 1 to 3 N PS times, each time with a different realization of the spatial coherence screen (but without changing the turbulence screen realizations) and average the intensity at the observation plane. The average intensity is the PCB result.…”
Section: Mean Intensity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somewhere between the first and second class of techniques lies the works of Voelz, Bush, and Idell (1997) and Xiao and Voelz (2006), in which the average properties of a partially coherent field are determined by constructing temporal and spatial realizations of the field, respectively, and averaging over these properties.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Partially Coherent Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%