Proceedings of OceanObs'09: Sustained Ocean Observations and Information for Society 2010
DOI: 10.5270/oceanobs09.cwp.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Measurements, Needs and Developments for the Next Decade

Abstract: A recent workshop on in-situ wave measurement technology noted that: (1) geographical coverage of insitu data is still very limited especially as far as any measure of wave directionality is concerned, and most measurements are taken near coasts in the Northern Hemisphere; (2) present in-situ reports are not standardized resulting in impaired utility; (3) significant differences exist in measured waves from different platforms, sensors, processing and moorings. Three main topics were discussed: (1) how to add … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Challenor and Cotton (2003), other national (or international) networks would also yield disparate calibrations. Again we are in no position to solve such issues, except to lend our support to the views of Swail et al (2010) that better consistency and accuracy of in situ ocean wave measurements is essential, not only for these sorts of calibration exercises, but for climate science in general. The mean refers to (altimeter minus buoy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Challenor and Cotton (2003), other national (or international) networks would also yield disparate calibrations. Again we are in no position to solve such issues, except to lend our support to the views of Swail et al (2010) that better consistency and accuracy of in situ ocean wave measurements is essential, not only for these sorts of calibration exercises, but for climate science in general. The mean refers to (altimeter minus buoy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durrant et al (2009) recently concluded that Canadian buoys were underestimating wave heights relative to the NDBC buoys by about 10%, and our slope estimates shown in Table 2 for Jason-1 confirm their result. These inconsistency problems among different in situ measurements are becoming widely appreciated, and a recent report has identified the critical need to assess and improve the quality of observations from the present networks of moored buoys (Swail et al, 2010). The recent work of Gemmrich et al (2011) should further emphasize this need.…”
Section: Buoy Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, waves are mapped globally based on numerical wave model. Therefore, altimeter and wave forecast/hindcast data ought to be validated by moored wave riders or bottom mounted wave sensors located mostly in relatively shallow waters (e.g., NDBC buoys, Swail et al 2010, Nowphas system in Japan, Nagai et al 2005). There are, however, a number of meteorological and tsunami monitoring buoys in deep waters such as TAO array and DART buoys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39]), wave data from buoys and ODAS [43], OceanSITES time series stations [36], and meteorological observations made at tide gauge locations [31]. In some cases, these data streams also…”
Section: Data Availability and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%