2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave absorbing-boundary method in seismic centrifuge simulation of vertical free-field ground motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies performed on the effects of different boundary conditions showed the major effect of the container on the seismic response of soils [ 57 , 58 , 59 ]. Considering the inappropriate effects of the rigid lateral boundaries [ 60 , 61 ], artificial boundaries are generally used as absorbing boundaries to reduce the reflected and generated waves caused by the lateral boundaries of the box [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. In recent years, the effects of different artificial boundaries such as duxseal materials, sponge, foam, and rubber sheets have been investigated on the seismic response of the soil [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies performed on the effects of different boundary conditions showed the major effect of the container on the seismic response of soils [ 57 , 58 , 59 ]. Considering the inappropriate effects of the rigid lateral boundaries [ 60 , 61 ], artificial boundaries are generally used as absorbing boundaries to reduce the reflected and generated waves caused by the lateral boundaries of the box [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. In recent years, the effects of different artificial boundaries such as duxseal materials, sponge, foam, and rubber sheets have been investigated on the seismic response of the soil [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the inappropriate effects of the rigid lateral boundaries [ 60 , 61 ], artificial boundaries are generally used as absorbing boundaries to reduce the reflected and generated waves caused by the lateral boundaries of the box [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. In recent years, the effects of different artificial boundaries such as duxseal materials, sponge, foam, and rubber sheets have been investigated on the seismic response of the soil [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ]. Hasheminezhad et al (2022) [ 22 ], as one of the most recent studies, applied an absorbent layer of the foam in a rigid-box shaking table to evaluate the effects of two retrofitting methods of wall-type gravel and rubber drains on the liquefaction mitigation and studied the generated excess pore water pressures as a measure for such a purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic centrifuge tests employing Duxseal or other energy-absorbing materials along their boundaries mainly consist of two categories: earthquake induced events with relatively large ground movement amplitudes and ground-borne vibration problems with small amplitude ground movements. The majority of these studies focus on the former category and relate to free-field ground motions (Pak et al 2011;Soudkhah and Pak 2012;Zhu et al 2018), retaining wall behavior (Dewoolkar et al 2001;Madabhushi and Haigh 2019;Madabhushi and Haigh 2021), shallow foundations (Chakrabortty and Popescu 2012;Heron et al 2015;Adamidis and Madabhushi 2018;Kassas et al 2020;Kassas et al 2021;Adamidis and Madabhushi 2021), basement structures sited on liquefiable soil (Hughes and Madabhushi 2018), and underground structures (Cilingir and Madabhushi 2011;Chian and Madabhushi 2013;Chian et al 2014). The latter category has mainly related to railway induced ground-borne vibrations and soilstructure interactions, including vibrations from surface (Yang et al 2013b) and underground railways (Yang et al 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first contributions in absorbing boundaries, but still one of the most popular ones, is the fully-local, viscous boundary element by Lysmer & Kuhlemeyer (1969). This boundary provides the conceptual basis of most of the currently used elements, which exhibit various levels of efficiency with increasing levels of nonlocality, (Berenger, 1994;Soudkhah & Pak, 2012;Lee et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2013;Duru & Kreiss, 2012). Moreover, many of these absorbing conditions have been used in recent FDs and FEs simulations of seismic regions, as large as the state of California and for frequencies up to 4.0 Hz, (Frankel, 1993;Komatitsch & Tromp, 1999;Min et al, 2003;Bielak et al, 2003;Komatitsch et al, 2004;Givoli, 2004;Frehner et al, 2008;Ichimura et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2009aLee et al, ,b, 2010Bielak et al, 2010;Chaljub et al, 2010;Lan & Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%