Effects of nano-clay on weight loss of wood-plastic composites (WPC) by five fungi were studied. Nanoclay particles of 20 to 50 nm size were applied at 2, 4, and 6% WPC of 0,90 g/cm 3 density. The white-rot fungi Physisporinus vitreus, Pleurotus ostreatus and Trametes versicolor as well as the brown-rot species Antrodia vaillantii and Coniophora puteana were used. Mass loss tests were conducted according to the European standard. The highest (3.2%) and lowest (0,2%) mass losses were produced by T. versicolor and P. vitreus in the control and 6%-nanoclay treatments, respectively. Obviously the weight loss of WPC depends on the fungus species. Although weight losses were extremely low, nano-clay considerably inhibited the growth of wood-deteriorating fungi. Mass loss correlated with water absorption.
Ground Reaction Curve (GRC) is one of the most important elements of convergence-confinement method generally used to design tunnels. Realistic presentation of GRC is usually assessed based on the advanced rock strength criteria, also, rock mass behavior (including plasticity and softening treatments). Since taking these parameters into account is not simply possible for practitioners and needs complicated coupled theoretical-numerical solutions, this paper presents a simple novel approach based on Evolutionary Polynomial Regression to determine GRC of rock masses obeying both Mohr-Coulomb and Hoek-Brown criteria and strain softening behaviors. The proposed models accurately present support pressures based on radial displacement, rock mass strength and softening parameter (determination coefficient of 97.98% and 94.2% respectively for Mohr-Coulomb and Hoek-Brown strain softening materials). The accuracy of the proposed equations are approved through comparing the EPR developed GRCs with the ground reaction curves available in the literature. Besides, the sensitivity analysis is carried out and in-situ stress, residual Hoek-Brown’s m constant and residual dilation angle are introduced as parameters with the most influence on the support pressure in Hoek-Brown and peak and residual geological strength index are the most affective parameters on the support pressure of tunnels in the strain softening Mohr-Coulomb rock mass.
Coupled Piled Raft Foundations (CPRFs) are broadly applied to share heavy loads of superstructures between piles and rafts and reduce total and differential settlements. Settlements induced by static/coupled static-dynamic loads are one of the main concerns of engineers in designing CPRFs. Evaluation of induced settlements of CPRFs has been commonly carried out using threedimensional finite element/finite difference modeling or through expensive real-scale/prototype model tests. Since the analyses, especially in the case of coupled static-dynamic loads, are not simply conducted, this paper presents two practical methods to gain the values of settlement. First, different nonlinear finite difference models under different static and coupled static-dynamic loads are developed to calculate exerted settlements. Analyses are performed with respect to different axial loads and pile's configurations, numbers, lengths, diameters, and spacing for both loading cases. Based on the results of well-validated three-dimensional finite difference modeling, artificial neural networks and evolutionary polynomial regressions are then applied and introduced as capable methods to accurately present both static and coupled static-dynamic settlements. Also, using a sensitivity analysis based on Cosine Amplitude Method, axial load is introduced as the most influential parameter, while the ratio l/d is reported as the least effective parameter on the settlements of CPRFs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.