2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watershed model parameter estimation and uncertainty in data-limited environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water quality data were available at all eight stations for a period of 4 years from 2003 to 2006 at a monthly time step interval. The hydrology was previously calibrated for a 5‐year period (1985–1989) and validated for a 4‐year period (2003–2006) at station 15E03 (Fonseca et al , ). Because there were no observed flow data for the other stations addressed in this paper, the same hydrology behaviour was assumed for the entire basin in order to perform water quality assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water quality data were available at all eight stations for a period of 4 years from 2003 to 2006 at a monthly time step interval. The hydrology was previously calibrated for a 5‐year period (1985–1989) and validated for a 4‐year period (2003–2006) at station 15E03 (Fonseca et al , ). Because there were no observed flow data for the other stations addressed in this paper, the same hydrology behaviour was assumed for the entire basin in order to perform water quality assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis on the HSPF model has been performed in many previous studies (e.g., Jacomino and Fields, 1997; Fonseca et al, 2014) [34,35]. However, due to the use of different values of the HSPF model parameters, the major factors affecting model output for each watershed may be different.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis For the Hydrology Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the use of different values of the HSPF model parameters, the major factors affecting model output for each watershed may be different. Al-Abed and Whiteley [28] and Fonseca et al [35] found that LZSN is the major factor, INFILT is the most sensitive parameter in a complex geomorphological river basin (Kourgialas et al [36]) and in the South National watershed in Eastern Ontario (Iskra and Droste, [37]), and DEEPFR is the most sensitive parameter in mountainous basins containing coal mines (Atkins et al [38]). However, we found that UZSN and INFILT are more sensitive.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis For the Hydrology Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, infiltration capacity (INFILT) is one of the parameters to which modeled streamflow is the most sensitive [33], and initial values were assigned based on a spatially distributed map of the hydrologic soil group (HSG). Hydrologic soil groups range from "A" to "D", where "A" soils are characterized by the highest infiltration rate and the lowest runoff potential and "D" soils have a very slow infiltration rate and the highest runoff potential.…”
Section: Hydrologic and Sediment Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%