Waterlogging effects on elemental composition of wheat genotypes in sodic soils

Sharma, Surinder K.; Kulshreshtha, Neeraj; Kumar, Ashwani; Yaduvanshi, N.P.S.; Singh, Monika; Prasad, Krishna; Basak, Nirmalendu

doi:10.1080/01904167.2018.1434541

Cited by 19 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It might be due to poor aeration for root respiration under waterlogging. Our results also are in line with earlier findings (Sharma and Swarup 1988, Setters and Waters 2003, Setter et al 2008, Sharma et al 2018. Yield declined due to waterlogging are associated with reduced production and limited survival of tillers, few and small fertile tillers, and small grain size Swarup 1988, Condom andGiunta 2003).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

Elemental toxicities – adaptive traits governing waterlogging tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under sodic soils

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most intolerant crops to soil waterlogging, so to evaluate the response of 10 wheat varieties to waterlogging stress under sodic soils, a pot experiment was conducted during 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2014-15 at ICAR-CSSRI, Karnal. Critically important physiological data on increase in element concentrations of Fe, Mn, Al and B in shoots indicated key mechanisms of tolerance under waterlogging condition in sodic soils. Concentrations of Fe, Mn, Al and B in wheat genotypes were greater under waterlogging in normal and sodic conditions. However, uptakes of these elements also varied. Mean concentrations of 327, 434, 541 and 624 mg/kg for Fe; 38.3, 48.9, 48.4 and 72.9 mg/kg for Mn; 47, 147, 217 and 226 mg/kg for Al and 5, 22, 48 and 51 mg/kg for B were recorded in pH 8.2, pH 8.2 +WL, pH 9.4 and pH 9.4 +WL treatments, respectively. Besides Mn, the elements concentration in wheat was 3-6 times greater than critical limit for the above mentioned elements. Genotype HD 2189, was the best performer and showed minimum increase in shoot Fe, Mn, Al and B concentration both under higher pH and waterlogging, whereas Brookton showed maximum increase. KRL 3-4 performed better despite high Fe and Mn indicating higher tissue tolerance. These observations point towards identification of considerable genetic diversity for Fe, Mn, Al and B in wheat.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

Elemental toxicities – adaptive traits governing waterlogging tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under sodic soils

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The first effects of waterlogging are experienced in the rhizosphere as microorganisms compete with roots for limited oxygen ( Lin and Sauter, 2018 ). Furthermore, waterlogging affects availability of nutrients in soil ( Sharma et al , 2018 ), causing an imbalance in nutrient uptake of plants and leading to both shortages and toxic build-ups of different plant nutrients ( Boem et al , 1996 ; Jiménez et al , 2015 ). The nutrient uptake in waterlogged soils is affected by changes in the chemical reduction of some nutrients (notably nitrate, ferric, and manganese ions) due to the anaerobic respiration by soil bacteria ( Ponnamperuma, 1972 ), limited root surface, as well as reduced proton motive force, less negative membrane potential and reduced metabolic control of xylem loading.…”

Section: What Are the Impacts Of Waterlogging On Plant Physiology?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects

Langan

Bernád

Walsh

et al. 2022

Journal of Experimental Botany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Yield losses to waterlogging are expected to become an increasingly costly and frequent issue in some regions of the world. Despite the extensive work that has been carried out examining the molecular and physiological responses to waterlogging, phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance has proven difficult. This difficulty is largely due to the high variability of waterlogging conditions such as duration, temperature, soil type, and growth stage of the crop. In this review, we aim to highlight efforts utilising phenotyping to assess and improve waterlogging tolerance in temperate crop species. We start by outlining the experimental methods that have been utilised to impose waterlogging stress, ranging from highly controlled conditions of hydroponic systems to large-scale screenings in the field. We also describe the phenotyping traits used to assess tolerance ranging from survival rates and visual scoring to precise photosynthetic measurements. Finally, we present an overview of the challenges faced in attempting to improve waterlogging tolerance, the trade-offs associated with phenotyping in controlled conditions, limitations of classic phenotyping methods and future trends using plant-imaging methods. If effectively utilised to increase crop resilience to changing climates, crop phenotyping has a major role to play in global food security.

show abstract

“…Many of these also change soil chemical and electro chemicals by decreasing redox potential and excess electron changes, such as Fe 3+ and Mn 4+ to Fe 2+ and Mn 2+ , correspondingly (Ponnamperuma, 1984; Jackson and Colmer, 2005; Singh and Setter, 2017). Thus, solubility of iron and manganese rises to toxic levels, which are potentially damaging to plant roots (Jones and Etherington, 1970; Aldana et al, 2014; Marashi, 2018; Sharma et al, 2018). Apart from the elemental toxicities to the sensitive root tips, increased concentration of secondary metabolites such as phenolics and volatile fatty acids may become injurious in the low-pH rhizosphere (Pang et al, 2007a; Shabala, 2011; Coutinho et al, 2018).…”

Section: Waterlogging Effect On Soil and Plant Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Waterlogging remains a significant constraint to cereal production across the globe in areas with high rainfall and/or poor drainage. Improving tolerance of plants to waterlogging is the most economical way of tackling the problem. However, under severe waterlogging combined agronomic, engineering and genetic solutions will be more effective. A wide range of agronomic and engineering solutions are currently being used by grain growers to reduce losses from waterlogging. In this scoping study, we reviewed the effects of waterlogging on plant growth, and advantages and disadvantages of various agronomic and engineering solutions which are used to mitigate waterlogging damage. Further research should be focused on: cost/benefit analyses of different drainage strategies; understanding the mechanisms of nutrient loss during waterlogging and quantifying the benefits of nutrient application; increasing soil profile de-watering through soil improvement and agronomic strategies; revealing specificity of the interaction between different management practices and environment as well as among management practices; and more importantly, combined genetic, agronomic and engineering strategies for varying environments.

show abstract

Waterlogging effects on elemental composition of wheat genotypes in sodic soils

Cited by 19 publications

References 21 publications

Elemental toxicities – adaptive traits governing waterlogging tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under sodic soils

Elemental toxicities – adaptive traits governing waterlogging tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under sodic soils

Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects

Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About