The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water vapor permeability in heterogeneous porous membranes: Analytical modeling and experimental characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PVA film absorbed the most until the 18th day, then very little after that, while the PE film absorbed evenly over the 34 days. This fact is due to the hydrophilic character of PVA which, in the first phase, absorbs more water vapor, having a higher affinity with water and in the second phase, approaching the saturation state absorbs less, having fewer hydroxyl fractions available [34,35]. The difference between the WVTR values of PVA and PE films is statistically significant at 99% (p < 0.01) according to One-Way Anova, the Tukey model.…”
Section: Pva Filmmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The PVA film absorbed the most until the 18th day, then very little after that, while the PE film absorbed evenly over the 34 days. This fact is due to the hydrophilic character of PVA which, in the first phase, absorbs more water vapor, having a higher affinity with water and in the second phase, approaching the saturation state absorbs less, having fewer hydroxyl fractions available [34,35]. The difference between the WVTR values of PVA and PE films is statistically significant at 99% (p < 0.01) according to One-Way Anova, the Tukey model.…”
Section: Pva Filmmentioning
confidence: 93%