1964
DOI: 10.1126/science.144.3620.876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Turnover in Cattle

Abstract: The half-life of the body water pool in cattle is unusually short, relative to their body size. The short half-life is not due to milk formation, since the same result is observed in nonlactating cattle as in cattle producing 23 kg (50 lb) of milk per day.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values suggest that factors other than egg production per se influence the rate of water turnover in hens. Similar observations with the dairy cow suggest that milk production per se is not responsible for the increased body water pool found in the lactating vs non-lactating cow (Black, et al, 1964). Chapman and Mihai (1972) showed the laying bird to have a greater body water flux (pool size x turnover rate) than the non-laying bird-(419 as opposed to 195 ml/d).…”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 74%
“…These values suggest that factors other than egg production per se influence the rate of water turnover in hens. Similar observations with the dairy cow suggest that milk production per se is not responsible for the increased body water pool found in the lactating vs non-lactating cow (Black, et al, 1964). Chapman and Mihai (1972) showed the laying bird to have a greater body water flux (pool size x turnover rate) than the non-laying bird-(419 as opposed to 195 ml/d).…”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Une meilleure compréhension des proportions entre tritium organique et tritium non échangeable conduirait probablement à réduire les évaluations des doses, en contrebalançant d'autres approximations soulignées par ailleurs (Black et al, 1964). Le point délicat est bien évidemment le temps et le coût de la préparation des échantillons, qui ne sont pas adaptés aux besoins réels de la surveillance d'un Centre nucléaire, compte tenu de la faiblesse des expositions.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For cow or beef, biological elimination rate for HTO in meat or milk is in the range 0.12e0.23 day À1 (half-life in the range 3e6 days) (Black et al, 1964;van den Hoek et al, 1979van den Hoek et al, , 1983; van den Hoek, 1986).…”
Section: Biological Elimination Rate For Hto In Meat and Milkmentioning
confidence: 96%