No abstract

Short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate are considered potential alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters. The efficacy of butyric acid on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens was tested in two studies. The effect of dietary butyrate on the ability to withstand coccidial oocyte challenge also was investigated. In experiment 1, male broiler chickens were fed diets supplemented with 0 or 11 ppm virginiamycin or 0.2 or 0.4% butyric acid (as mono-, di-, and triglyceride). In experiment 2, broilers were fed bacitracin methylene disalicylate or 0.1 or 0.2% butyric acid. In another trial, birds vaccinated against coccidiosis were challenged with oocytes at 21 d and examined 6 d later. In experiment 1, diet treatments had no effect on body weight gain. Feed intake of the birds fed 0.4% butyric acid was decreased (P < 0.01) compared with birds fed the nonmedicated diet during the starter period, whereas birds fed 0.2% butyric acid had similar feed intake to the control birds. In experiment 2, diet treatments did not affect the performance of broiler chicks while carcass weight and breast meat yield increased (P < 0.01) in birds fed 0.2% butyric acid. With oocyte challenge, birds that had received butyric acid before challenge showed higher growth rate following the challenge compared with birds that received nonmedicated feed. Bacitracin decreased (P < 0.05%) duodenal villi crypt depth, whereas villus length was similar in birds fed butyric acid or the nonmedicated control diet. These results show that 0.2% butyric acid can help to maintain the performance and carcass quality of broilers, especially in vaccinated birds challenged with coccidiosis.

No abstract

No abstract

Male broiler chickens were fed corn-soybean diets providing 2,700, 2,900, 3,100 or 3,300 kcal ME/kg. In all experiments, each treatment was tested with three replicate groups of 30 birds grown to 49 d of age. In Experiment 1, birds consumed the various diets ad libitum whereas in Experiment 2, all birds received identical and restricted quantities of feed so as to ensure variable intakes of energy. In a third experiment, after 7 d of age, broilers had access to feed in two feeders that contained only the highest level of energy, or the 3,300 kcal ME/kg diet in combination with one of the other diets previously described. Providing diets of 2,700 to 3,300 kcal ME/kg for ad libitum consumption had no effect on growth rate (P > 0.05) and energy intake was constant; however, reducing the energy level of the diet did result in reduced carcass fatness (P < 0.01). When feed intake was controlled in Experiment 2, there was reduced growth (P < 0.01) rate as energy level of the diet was reduced. This reduced growth was associated with dramatic reduction in carcass fatness (P < 0.01), although breast meat yield was not affected. When broilers were offered a choice of diets, they showed remarkably precise control of intake, such that energy intake was again constant across all treatments. However, even though energy intake was constant, broilers consuming the choice diets involving the lower energy content diets tended to have less carcass fat. It is concluded that the broiler still possesses a good ability to control its feed intake based on desire to normalize energy intake. As energy intake is decreased, or there is increased protein intake, the bird deposits less carcass fat.