2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2006.00358.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water rights: a comparison of the impacts of urban and irrigation reforms in Australia

Abstract: Although there has been a policy thrust towards making all Australians more cognisant of the relative scarcity of water resources, the approach adopted for urban dwellers differs markedly from that applied to irrigators. These differences are examined from a property-rights perspective focussing primarily on the institutional hierarchies in the Victorian water sector. The analysis reveals significant attenuation of urban dwellers' rights, presumably on the basis of the information deficiencies that circumscrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, these positive economic effects are largely explained by the expansion of more efficient new water users, the adoption of water conserving technologies and the elimination of unnecessary or non-cost-effective uses of water (Zilberman & Schoengold, 2005). Indeed, in empirical terms, researchers have shown that water markets have made significant income contributions to many regional and national economies, such as Spain (Lee & Jouravlev, 1998), Australia (Peterson et al, 2004;Crase & Dollery, 2006;Brooks & Harris, 2008;Qureshi et al, 2009) and the United States (Bjornlund & McKay, 2002;Grafton et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Usually, these positive economic effects are largely explained by the expansion of more efficient new water users, the adoption of water conserving technologies and the elimination of unnecessary or non-cost-effective uses of water (Zilberman & Schoengold, 2005). Indeed, in empirical terms, researchers have shown that water markets have made significant income contributions to many regional and national economies, such as Spain (Lee & Jouravlev, 1998), Australia (Peterson et al, 2004;Crase & Dollery, 2006;Brooks & Harris, 2008;Qureshi et al, 2009) and the United States (Bjornlund & McKay, 2002;Grafton et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such subdivision highlights how attributes of rights may be adjusted separately along various dimensions, specifying rights (and implicitly leaving other attributes of rights undefined). As was shown by Challen [3] and Crase and Dollery [27], this deconstruction can also be applied to water rights. In order to keep the size of the CR experiment within manageable proportions only the most relevant dimensions for the case of South Africa were included.…”
Section: Design Of the Attribute Spacementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Removing impediments to rural–urban water transfers increases the choice of supply augmentation options and economic efficiency as water is transferred to a higher marginal value (Crase & Dollery, ; Quiggin, ; Productivity Commission, , ). Water grids and interconnecting pipelines can contribute to effective inter‐sectoral water transfers.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%