2018
DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2018.1507339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality modeling and sensitivity analysis using Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) in the Shenandoah River watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Comparison: If compare the scrum methodology, with the methodology RUP (rational unified process) [37], can say, that the methodology RUP (rational unified process), is rigid, meaning that if the customer wants a change, it is very difficult to make it, since you follow the plan until the end of the project development, whereas in the Scrum, this is possible, because, scrum is flexible to change, another comparison, you can make, The reason for this is that, in the methodology RUP (rational unified process), the project is conceived as one, while in scrum the project is divided into parts. It can also be said that in the methodology, the deliverable is at the end of the entire project development, while in scrum the delivery is constant [38]. This comparison of Scrum and RUP can be seen in Table V.…”
Section: About the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…• Comparison: If compare the scrum methodology, with the methodology RUP (rational unified process) [37], can say, that the methodology RUP (rational unified process), is rigid, meaning that if the customer wants a change, it is very difficult to make it, since you follow the plan until the end of the project development, whereas in the Scrum, this is possible, because, scrum is flexible to change, another comparison, you can make, The reason for this is that, in the methodology RUP (rational unified process), the project is conceived as one, while in scrum the project is divided into parts. It can also be said that in the methodology, the deliverable is at the end of the entire project development, while in scrum the delivery is constant [38]. This comparison of Scrum and RUP can be seen in Table V.…”
Section: About the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Existing water quality prediction models can be divided into two types: mechanistic and non-mechanistic models [7,8] . Mechanistic models, such as the Streeter Phelps (S-P) model [9][10][11][12] , QUAL2E model [13][14][15] , Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) [15][16][17] , Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) [18][19][20] , etc., are based on physical and chemical principles and require a large amount of basic and long-term monitoring data. However, such data are often unavailable or incomplete in practice, which limits the applicability and accuracy of mechanistic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where the station network is sparse and the spatial heterogeneity of COD is high, it can be challenging to obtain accurate spatial information of COD using interpolation-based methods. Another basic approach required to solve the water pollution problem is the modeling of water quality changes by developing some mathematical models [ 14 , 15 ]. These process-based models have the ability of simulating and predicting complex processes in water ecosystems, identifying the behavior of pollutants, and recognizing the spatial distribution of water quality parameters [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%