2012
DOI: 10.1614/ipsm-d-11-00023.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Quality Improvement of a Reservoir Invaded by an Exotic Macrophyte

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the macrophyte waterhyacinth on the water quality of a reservoir in Colombia. Postinvasion water quality assessments were performed during three different hydrological periods and compared with preinvasion data. The results show that water quality has improved, especially in terms of transparency, showing an increase in Secchi disk values from 0.3 to 2 m (1 to 6.6 ft). The analysis strongly suggests that the improvement in water quality is due to the filterin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK, the combined cost of controlling invasive plants, together with their economic impact, is estimated to be £1.7 billion per annum(The Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat, 2015). Therefore, there is a significantjuxtaposition between using species of invasive plants in phytoremediation, and management strategies to control invasive species (Rodríguez et al, 2012). Given that in many cases the complete eradication of invasive aquatic macrophytes such as Eichhornia crassipes is unlikely, it may be more appropriate to exploit these macrophytes as part of an integrated management strategy that controls the spread of these species whilst at the same timeeffectively removing nutrients and metals, capturing suspended sediment, and harvesting the biomass for economic gain (Patel, 2012;Yan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Issues In Utilising Invasive Macrophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the UK, the combined cost of controlling invasive plants, together with their economic impact, is estimated to be £1.7 billion per annum(The Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat, 2015). Therefore, there is a significantjuxtaposition between using species of invasive plants in phytoremediation, and management strategies to control invasive species (Rodríguez et al, 2012). Given that in many cases the complete eradication of invasive aquatic macrophytes such as Eichhornia crassipes is unlikely, it may be more appropriate to exploit these macrophytes as part of an integrated management strategy that controls the spread of these species whilst at the same timeeffectively removing nutrients and metals, capturing suspended sediment, and harvesting the biomass for economic gain (Patel, 2012;Yan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Issues In Utilising Invasive Macrophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are important factors to consider including the containment of macrophytes to avoid transferto other water bodies (e.g. via contaminated harvesting equipment or through downstream spread of fragments), including the most appropriate harvesting technique, and the sustainability of exploiting such an ecological engineering systems (Rodríguez et al, 2012;Yan et al, 2017). The sitespecific context will likely determine the appropriateness of active harvest of invasive aquatic plants (Yan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Issues In Utilising Invasive Macrophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water hyacinth possess a complex root system, with root length varying from 200 to 2000 mm and root surface area varying from 30 to 60 m 2 per individual macrophyte [ 16 ]. The roots of water hyacinth may play an important role in the removal of heavy metals and antibiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive free-floating plants, such as Eichhornia crassipes, are known to cause significant ecological damage by altering water quality [4,5], reducing the abundance and richness of wetland plant communities [6], and even affecting bacteria and algae [7]. Moreover, dense mats of free-floating invaders can reduce submerged macrophyte biomass and diversity [8,9], mostly because they generate dark conditions, secrete allelochemicals and compete fiercely with other species for nutrients and space [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%