2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources using APCS-MLR and PMF receptor modeling techniques in three major rivers of South Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
116
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not appropriate to apply factor analysis when the correlations among the variables are near zero or very weak, because it is not possible to summarize the information. The KMO value ranges from 0 to 1, with values above 0.6 indicating that the variables and samples evaluated are suitable for factor analysis (Gumbo et al 2016;Gholizadeh et al 2016;Mao et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not appropriate to apply factor analysis when the correlations among the variables are near zero or very weak, because it is not possible to summarize the information. The KMO value ranges from 0 to 1, with values above 0.6 indicating that the variables and samples evaluated are suitable for factor analysis (Gumbo et al 2016;Gholizadeh et al 2016;Mao et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicated the importance of ecosystem services provided by grasslands and urban green spaces in contributing to better water quality (Martinico et al 2014), because the Recanto microbasin has a lower degree of urbanization (21%), compared to the Santa Angélica (47%) and Pylles (81%) areas, leading to a lower specific TDS load. Other studies have also described the influence of urbanization and industrialization on the degradation of water resources in catchments of developed and developing countries including Brazil (Medeiros et al 2013;Daniel et al 2002;Silva et al 2013), Colombia (Sandoval et al 2014), the USA (O 'Neill et al 2013;Gholizadeh et al 2016), South Africa (Gumbo et al 2016), Portugal (Gomes et al 2014), India (Jabeen et al 2014;Jamwal et al 2008), Australia (Hatt et al 2004), Turkey (Bilgin 2015), Sweden (Galfi et al 2016;Berndtsson and Bengtsson 2006) and Finland (Metsäranta et al 2005). …”
Section: Pollutant Loads Transported By Urban Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thurston et al (1985) first proposed that, after the normalization of original data, the absolute real score of a factor could be obtained using factor analysis [73], and then combined with a multivariate linear regression model to calculate a common factor contribution rate on water targets. PC S -SMLR can quantitatively depict the main factor's contribution to the receptor of each index, such as the air and water pollution source analysis used in studies [54,74]. This methodology has rarely been used in the soil environment.…”
Section: Receptor Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such monitoring systems generate voluminous databases and their analysis requires robust analytical tools [8]. In recent years, multivariate statistical techniques (such as principal component analysis (PCA), factor analysis (FA) and absolute principal component score-multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR)) have been widely used in the water environment to evaluate both temporal and spatial variations of water quality [8][9][10], to provide qualitative information about potential pollution sources [6,[11][12][13][14][15], and to estimate source distributions for each pollution variable [4,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%