1971
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19710560105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Plant Communities in Eastern Lower Saxony (II.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cover values of all macrophyte species that rooted in the river bed below the water level were recorded. In addition, several environmental parameters were recorded, notably the width and depth of the water body, flow velocity (determined in the stream line with the drift method as it had been used by Weber-Oldecop, 1969) and the sediment type within the plot.…”
Section: Sampling Design and Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cover values of all macrophyte species that rooted in the river bed below the water level were recorded. In addition, several environmental parameters were recorded, notably the width and depth of the water body, flow velocity (determined in the stream line with the drift method as it had been used by Weber-Oldecop, 1969) and the sediment type within the plot.…”
Section: Sampling Design and Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analysed data sets from three different periods (A: 1936-1969, B: 1983-1986, C: 2010/2011). Set A, referred to as the 1950s data, contains 338 relevés from the literature (Roll, 1939;Weber-Oldecop, 1969) and from the Reinhold-Tüxen-Archive in Hannover (Hoppe, 2005). The relevés deposited in the Tüxen archive were mostly taken by Rudolph Alpers in 1946.…”
Section: Data Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grube (1975) reported dense macrophyte communities from that river. Herr et al (1989b) no longer found the species-rich macrophyte communities in the river Oker, which had been described by Weber-Oldecop (1969). Artificial creation of new sites suitable for macrophyte growth also occurs, but is a negligible process compared to the destructions listed above.…”
Section: Changes In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the section with much more gravel as substrates, crowfoots were the main species. This is the expected vegetation (WEBER-OLDECOP, 1971;DETHIOUX and NOIRFALISE, 1985;WIEGLEB and HERR, 1985;HAURY et al, 1994;. However, site 2 was characterised by an impoverished flora.…”
Section: Floristic Richness and Biological Quality According To An Upmentioning
confidence: 71%