2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4892638
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water permeability of nanoporous graphene at realistic pressures for reverse osmosis desalination

Abstract: Nanoporous graphene (NPG) shows tremendous promise as an ultra-permeable membrane for water desalination thanks to its atomic thickness and precise sieving properties. However, a significant gap exists in the literature between the ideal conditions assumed for NPG desalination and the physical environment inherent to reverse osmosis (RO) systems. In particular, the water permeability of NPG has been calculated previously based on very high pressures (1000-2000 bars). Does NPG maintain its ultrahigh water perme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
107
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
16
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a follow-on study, we confirmed that NPG retains its ultrahigh water permeability under the realistic pressures employed in RO (10 bar to 100 bar) by showing that the water flux across NPG continues to scale linearly with applied pressure down to this lower pressure range [76]. To this end, we examined the desalination process across NPG under feed pressures as low as 29 bar using much longer MD simulations (see Fig.…”
Section: Proof Of Conceptsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a follow-on study, we confirmed that NPG retains its ultrahigh water permeability under the realistic pressures employed in RO (10 bar to 100 bar) by showing that the water flux across NPG continues to scale linearly with applied pressure down to this lower pressure range [76]. To this end, we examined the desalination process across NPG under feed pressures as low as 29 bar using much longer MD simulations (see Fig.…”
Section: Proof Of Conceptsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. b) Water flux across hydrogenated NPG vs feed pressure, reprinted with permission from [76].…”
Section: Salt Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial water flux, measured as the difference in the water columns' height between the chambers filled with salt and deionized water versus time, was ∼70 g m −2 s −1 atm −1 (7 × 10 −15 g s −1 atm −1 per pore, assuming a pore density of 1 × 10 12 cm −2 ) for a membrane with I D /I G ≈ 1. Such a flux is more than two orders of magnitude lower than that predicted using numerical simulations by Cohen-Tanugi and colleagues for different pore geometries (1.7 × 10 −12 g s −1 bar −1 per pore) 28 . The observed osmotic pressure-driven asymmetric water flux unambiguously confirms the semipermeable nature of the plasmatreated graphene membranes, at least for the pore densities used in this experiment (I D /I G ≈ 1, ∼1 × 10 12 cm −2 , membrane conductivity ∼0.2 µS).…”
Section: Water Transport and Salt Rejection Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Aqueous electrolytes and model carbon-based materials have already been investigated by molecular simulation in the context of desalination by reverse osmosis [42][43][44] or for nanofluidic osmotic diodes [45]. Molecular simulation provided insights into the structure and dynamics of water and aqueous electrolytes in carbon nanotubes and nanopores [46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%