2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2015.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water interaction with hydrogenated and oxidized detonation nanodiamonds — Microscopic and spectroscopic analyses

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWater interaction with surface modified nanodiamonds (NDs) is critical for many possible applications of NDs e.g. in biomedicine. Here we report on investigation of water interaction with hydrogenated and oxidized detonation nanodiamonds (H-DNDs, O-DNDs) by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermal analysis, and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). Higher water content (4.4%) as well as weaker interaction of water with H-DNDs are identified by thermal analysis. It is expl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
63
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy may have several reasons, but we suppose that the main effect comes from a hydration shell formed in water on oxidized DND surface. Such a shell of surface-bound water on DNDs3738 was reported to have thickness of about 0.6 nm39. This value agrees well with our results as the average difference between the AFM and DLS results is 1.6 ± 0.2 nm which yields a hydration shell thickness of 0.8 ± 0.1 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This discrepancy may have several reasons, but we suppose that the main effect comes from a hydration shell formed in water on oxidized DND surface. Such a shell of surface-bound water on DNDs3738 was reported to have thickness of about 0.6 nm39. This value agrees well with our results as the average difference between the AFM and DLS results is 1.6 ± 0.2 nm which yields a hydration shell thickness of 0.8 ± 0.1 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In agreement with the NEXAFS results, DND-H Anneal appears to contain less oxygen than the DND-H Plasma sample. However, at least part of this oxygen could be associated with water molecules adsorbed on the DND surface and is not necessarily chemically bound to the surface [9,44,45]. All samples show a small N1s peak at 398.1 eV, indicating the presence of ≈1-2 at% nitrogen in all samples.…”
Section: Nexafs Xps and Ftirmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…FTIR spectra ( Figure 3D) also qualitatively suggest the successful hydrogenation of both DND-H Anneal and DND-H Plasma samples: the C=O peak at 1750 cm −1 disappears in both hydrogenated samples, while two CH x stretch peaks appear at 2875 cm −1 & 2930 cm −1 , which are characteristic of hydrogen termination [8,49,50]. Both O-H bending and stretching modes at 1630 cm −1 and 3400 cm −1 may indicate incomplete surface modification or be caused by adsorbed water molecules on the surface of the DNDs [9,44,45]. Another change due to hydrogenation is the appearance of a broad shoulder at ≈1550 cm −1 which is typically associated with C=C stretching [44,51,52].…”
Section: Nexafs Xps and Ftirmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The amount of water and difference between as-received and oxidized DNDs is in a good agreement with thermogravimetric analysis of DNDs in our prior work. 30 Note, that 2-3 at% of nitrogen was found in each sample. This is related to impurities naturally found in detonation NDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%