2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60124-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water flow measurement in large bore pipes: An experimental comparison between two different types of insertion flowmeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F. Cascetta et al [8] have compared the performances of two different types of insertion flow meter, namely magnetic flow meter and turbine flow meter and have shown that magnetic flow meter has the claimed accuracy in the entire flow range but the other has the claimed accuracy only in upper range. F.Cascetta [9] has studied the effect of pressure on the performance of a coriolis mass flow meter and has shown that the fluid pressure affects the accuracy of coriolis flow meter. S.G.Etemad [10] have shown that the power-law index, the Reynolds number, and the distance between the impact and static tubes affect the operation of pitot tube in flow measurement and have proposed correction technique for both Newtonian and non-newtonian fluids by using neural network model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F. Cascetta et al [8] have compared the performances of two different types of insertion flow meter, namely magnetic flow meter and turbine flow meter and have shown that magnetic flow meter has the claimed accuracy in the entire flow range but the other has the claimed accuracy only in upper range. F.Cascetta [9] has studied the effect of pressure on the performance of a coriolis mass flow meter and has shown that the fluid pressure affects the accuracy of coriolis flow meter. S.G.Etemad [10] have shown that the power-law index, the Reynolds number, and the distance between the impact and static tubes affect the operation of pitot tube in flow measurement and have proposed correction technique for both Newtonian and non-newtonian fluids by using neural network model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, he recommended that the position, 0.762R away from the center of cross-section, is critical position for insertion measurement [4]. In 2001, Furio Cascetta and Adolfo Palombo, Italians, compared insertion electromagnetic flowmeter with insertion turbine flowmeter in applications of a large pipeline, and found that the insertion electromagnetic flowmeter has higher accuracy and range ratio [5]. Recently, the research on the flow field distribution of insertion electromagnetic flowmeter sensor gives a fitting polynomial equation of velocity distribution coefficient α and n, mostly based on Nikuradse velocity distribution model [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%