2007
DOI: 10.1118/1.2719363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water‐equivalent dosimeter array for small‐field external beam radiotherapy

Abstract: With the increasing complexity of dose patterns external beam radiotherapy, there is a great need for new types of dosimeters. We studied the first prototype of a new dosimeter array consisting of water-equivalent plastic scintillating fibers for dose measurement in external beam radiotherapy. We found that this array allows precise, rapid dose evaluation of small photon fields. Starting with a dosimeter system constructed with a single scintillating fiber coupled to a clear optical fiber and read using a char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plastic scintillator was shown to measure higher output factors than the other detectors for all field sizes with the sole exception of the 5 mm field size, where the diode showed higher output and the ionization chamber was not tested due to its large size. Archambault et al 25 showed that a 1.4 mm 3 plastic scintillating fiber measured an output factor that was ϳ4% higher than that measured by a 7 mm 3 ionization chamber using a 1 ϫ 1 cm 2 jaw-defined, 6 MV linac beam. This is close to the disparity we see in our 1 ϫ 1 cm 2 output factors for jaw-defined fields ͓see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plastic scintillator was shown to measure higher output factors than the other detectors for all field sizes with the sole exception of the 5 mm field size, where the diode showed higher output and the ionization chamber was not tested due to its large size. Archambault et al 25 showed that a 1.4 mm 3 plastic scintillating fiber measured an output factor that was ϳ4% higher than that measured by a 7 mm 3 ionization chamber using a 1 ϫ 1 cm 2 jaw-defined, 6 MV linac beam. This is close to the disparity we see in our 1 ϫ 1 cm 2 output factors for jaw-defined fields ͓see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Plastic scintillation dosimetry in the setting of small-field irradiation has been studied by several investigators using a variety of systems. [22][23][24][25] However, no close examination has been made of the dependence of the measurement of output factors on the way in which the small fields are defined. The aim of the study reported here was to explore this dependence using plastic scintillation dosimetry and the fielddefining mechanisms associated with a clinical IMRT linac and to expand the body of knowledge concerning the viability of plastic scintillators for accurately measuring small radiation fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic scintillator based fiber-optic dosimeters have been widely studied for use and applications in radiation therapy measurements. [20][21][22][23] Prior work has shown the ability of fiber-optic dosimeters that feature 5 mm-long plastic scintillators to measure small radiation fields down to 1 cm diameter. 24 Similarly, fiber-optic sensors assembled in 2D arrays have been demonstrated to measure radiation field sizes down to 1.5×5 cm with a resolution of 5 mm.…”
Section: B Fiber-optic Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to conventional dosimeters, different types of scintillating fiber-optic dosimeters (SFODs) using various organic scintillators have been developed [1][2][3][4]. For radiotherapy dosimetry, the SFODs offer a number of advantages, including small sensitivity volume, substantial flexibility, tissue or water equivalence, remote and real-time sensing, and immunity to electromagnetic interference (EMI), because they use optical fibers to guide light signal containing dose information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%