2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water defluoridation with special emphasis on adsorbents-containing metal oxides and/or hydroxides: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluoride (F À ) contamination has been recognized as one of the major health concerns worldwide, especially in several parts of India, China, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Tanzania, Argentina, and Mexico [4]. The prime sources of fluoride contamination are naturogenic in origin and include processes such as weathering, dissolution of fluoride-rich rocks, volcanic ash, and marine aerosols [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluoride (F À ) contamination has been recognized as one of the major health concerns worldwide, especially in several parts of India, China, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Tanzania, Argentina, and Mexico [4]. The prime sources of fluoride contamination are naturogenic in origin and include processes such as weathering, dissolution of fluoride-rich rocks, volcanic ash, and marine aerosols [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between adsorbent and absorbent materials, adsorbents are predominantly utilized for this purpose. With a potential to be developed at a relatively low cost, and flexibility and simplicity in process design, operation and maintenance, adsorption has emerged as an attractive technology for salt rejection [360]. The progressive steps involved in the adsorption process include the transport of the ions from the bulk solution to the adsorbent surface; adsorption of the ions at the surface; transport of the ions within the adsorbent sites and then desorption of adsorbed ions for regeneration purposes [361].…”
Section: Sorbent Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons why the defluoridation of water in rural contexts is an open challenge. Up to now, this seems to be determined by the lack of technology transfer to a feasible method in terms of overall cost and power supply (e.g., reverse osmosis), complexity of the method (e.g., electrocoagulation), cost of sorbent supply and management (e.g., most of synthetic compounds), or low F removal capacity (e.g., bone char [BC] and many natural materials) (Khairnar et al 2015; Mumtaz et al 2015; Velazquez‐Jimenez et al 2015). Furthermore, the acceptance of any new defluoridation method on behalf of rural communities is critical for policymakers and other stakeholders if they want to facilitate the adoption of the technology (Sorlini et al 2011; Datturi et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%