2009
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.44.5.1308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Conservation, Growth, and Water Use Efficiency of Container-grown Woody Ornamentals Irrigated Based on Daily Water Use

Abstract: Irrigation scheduling based on plant daily water use (DWU) to conserve water without adversely affecting plant growth compared with a traditional irrigation rate was investigated for 25 common container-grown woody ornamentals. Ten different taxa were grown in 2006 and 2007 and five in 2008 in 10.2-L (No. 3) containers. Overhead irrigation was applied in four treatments: 1) a control irrigation rate of 19 mm (1.07 L per container) per application (control); 2) irrigation scheduled to replace 100% DWU p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
74
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tyler et al (1996) found a reduction of only 8% of maximum shoot dry weight for Cotoneaster dammeri 'Skogholm' with a leaching fraction of 0.0 to 0.2 instead of 0.4 to 0.6. Applying 6% to 75% less water than the control treatment of 19 mm · d -1 increased shoot dry weight or had no effect on 23 different woody ornamental species (Warsaw et al, 2009). Our results support these findings with shoot dry weight of plants produced at the 0.40-m 3 · m -3 threshold similar to those grown at the 0.50-m 3 · m -3 threshold while receiving 49% and 87% less water for 'August Beauty' and 'Radicans', respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tyler et al (1996) found a reduction of only 8% of maximum shoot dry weight for Cotoneaster dammeri 'Skogholm' with a leaching fraction of 0.0 to 0.2 instead of 0.4 to 0.6. Applying 6% to 75% less water than the control treatment of 19 mm · d -1 increased shoot dry weight or had no effect on 23 different woody ornamental species (Warsaw et al, 2009). Our results support these findings with shoot dry weight of plants produced at the 0.40-m 3 · m -3 threshold similar to those grown at the 0.50-m 3 · m -3 threshold while receiving 49% and 87% less water for 'August Beauty' and 'Radicans', respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Best management practices such as cyclic irrigation, grouping plants based on water needs, and runoff collection basins are effective methods of improving irrigation (Chappell et al, 2013a) but do not control irrigation based on actual crop water requirements. Approaches to irrigation control based on substrate volumetric water content and/or daily water use (DWU) apply only the water needed by the crop to replace what is lost resulting from evapotranspiration and can provide greater efficiency (Bayer et al, 2013;van Iersel et al, 2010;Warsaw et al, 2009). Irrigating based on q and DWU requires knowledge of a diversity of ornamental plant water requirements, which is currently limited (Warsaw et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have reported little to no change in shoot dry weight with reduced irrigation volumes. Warsaw et al (2009) reported increased or no effect on plant growth index for 23 common container-grown woody ornamental species by irrigating based on replacement of 100% DWU or less (that reduced total irrigation applied by 6% to 75% depending on treatment and species) compared with the control of 19 mm per irrigation. Welsh et al threshold at which the plants were irrigated (left) or total irrigation volume (right).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…), vinca (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don), and wax begonia (Begonia × semperflorens-cultorum Hort. ); or remain unaffected by substrate VWC for cheddar pink (Dianthus gratianopolitanus L.), columbine (Aquilegia canadensis L.), geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum Bailey), petunia, and rosemary [8,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%