2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2021.3129182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Body Automated Extraction in Polarization SAR Images With Dense-Coordinate-Feature-Concatenate Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of non-local speckle filters for coastline extraction purposes is addressed in [19], where single-polarization X-band TanDEM-X pursuit monostatic SAR measurements were considered. In [20], the "twin-problem" related to the extraction of the waterline associated with a reservoir is addressed using dual-polarimetric SAR measurements with the main goal of estimating the waterbody area. The accuracy of the estimated waterbody area is contrasted with estimates obtained using single-polarization SAR measurements and with ancillary in situ observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of non-local speckle filters for coastline extraction purposes is addressed in [19], where single-polarization X-band TanDEM-X pursuit monostatic SAR measurements were considered. In [20], the "twin-problem" related to the extraction of the waterline associated with a reservoir is addressed using dual-polarimetric SAR measurements with the main goal of estimating the waterbody area. The accuracy of the estimated waterbody area is contrasted with estimates obtained using single-polarization SAR measurements and with ancillary in situ observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work by Denbina et al [18], CNNs are adopted to detect flooding in urban areas, which suggests the potential of CNN-based urban water extraction in SAR images. Furthermore, a dense-coordinate-feature-concatenate network (DCFNet) is proposed to extract and fuse the water features [19]. The experimental results on Gaofen-3 and Sentinel-1 SAR images show that DCFNet can reduce the influence of ground interference and speckle noise to some extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, multi-polarization SAR images can provide more information about water body properties. Furthermore, rough water surfaces may be blanketed in copolarization SAR data, whereas cross-polarization SAR data can still provide water evidence [25]. In [17], H-A-α polarimetric decomposition is integrated with FCN to exploit the polarimetric information in PolSAR images, with an overall accuracy rate of up to 95%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%