The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1983
DOI: 10.1021/ac00256a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water analysis

Abstract: This review is produced from a search of the literature as performed with the DIALOG capabilities of Chemical Abstracts Service. The material covered in this particular review is a continuation of past reviews by the same authors and covers the period from September 1980 to October 1982 It is obvious that the level of activity in the publication of research results by analytical chemists and spectrographers in the steel industry is significantly reduced and directly reflects the malais that affects our industr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speciation techniques based on the separation of different chromium species before detection possess the advantage of making possible the combination of selective with highly sensitive detection techniques. Although the detection limits of the combined technique can be improved by the preconcentration step, a serious drawback is the complex and timeconsuming sample pre-treatment, including solvent extraction, 11,12 coprecipitation, 13,14 electrochemical separation, 15 ion exchange [16][17][18][19] and solid-phase extraction. [20][21][22] Most methods of selective extraction are based on the extraction of Cr 6+ with chelating agents such as dithiocarbamates 23,24 or liquid ion exchangers, such as Amberlite IRA-400.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speciation techniques based on the separation of different chromium species before detection possess the advantage of making possible the combination of selective with highly sensitive detection techniques. Although the detection limits of the combined technique can be improved by the preconcentration step, a serious drawback is the complex and timeconsuming sample pre-treatment, including solvent extraction, 11,12 coprecipitation, 13,14 electrochemical separation, 15 ion exchange [16][17][18][19] and solid-phase extraction. [20][21][22] Most methods of selective extraction are based on the extraction of Cr 6+ with chelating agents such as dithiocarbamates 23,24 or liquid ion exchangers, such as Amberlite IRA-400.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for the speciation of inorganic chromium are, however, relatively time-consuming, involving species separation based on solvent extraction [6,7], coprecipitation [8,9], electrochemical separation [10], ion exchange [11][12][13][14] and solid-phase extraction [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an on-line extraction and evaporation procedure was described for liquid chromatography (3), but this system seems to be rather complex. Nowadays, cleanup and trace enrichment via precolumn techniques is widely used in water (4) and biological (5)(6)(7) analysis. Although many sample pretreatments are still done with off-line disposable columns, the on-line techniques will be favored because of the automation aspect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%