2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp503504e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Accommodation and Desorption Kinetics on Ice

Abstract: The interaction of water vapor with ice remains incompletely understood despite its importance in environmental processes. A particular concern is the probability for water accommodation on the ice surface, for which results from earlier studies vary by more than 2 orders of magnitude. Here, we apply an environmental molecular beam method to directly determine water accommodation and desorption kinetics on ice. Short D2O gas pulses collide with H2O ice between 170 and 200 K, and a fraction of the adsorbed mole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 summarizes the water accommodation coefficients determined for HxOH-, AcOH-, and HNO 3 -coated ice surfaces together with the bare ice results. 4 Adsorption of nitric acid and AcOH results in α obs values close to unity, and thus, the acids significantly enhance accommodation compared to pure ice. The observed α obs values are comparable for HxOH-covered ice and bare ice, but as illustrated in Figure 5, the underlying kinetics are completely altered by the adsorption of the alcohol, which functions as a relatively inefficient barrier for accommodation as well as desorption of water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 summarizes the water accommodation coefficients determined for HxOH-, AcOH-, and HNO 3 -coated ice surfaces together with the bare ice results. 4 Adsorption of nitric acid and AcOH results in α obs values close to unity, and thus, the acids significantly enhance accommodation compared to pure ice. The observed α obs values are comparable for HxOH-covered ice and bare ice, but as illustrated in Figure 5, the underlying kinetics are completely altered by the adsorption of the alcohol, which functions as a relatively inefficient barrier for accommodation as well as desorption of water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, water molecules will, on average, spend approximately 5 ms on an ice surface at 200 K before either desorbing or diffusing into the bulk. 4 Here, we focus on water accommodation on ice and organic surfaces that serve as proxies for the more complex systems expected to be found in the atmosphere. Several studies confirm that α s for water molecules on ice is close to unity due to efficient energy transfer to phonons at surface impact and a relatively high binding energy for water to the ice surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has the beneficial effect that sublimation from the electrodes is at least 10 3 times less than from the sample surfaces and can be neglected, which simplifies the calculation of the deposition rate. Under the well-supported assumption of a sticking probability of unity for water molecules on water ice under the experimental conditions employed here (Batista et al, 2005;Brown et al, 1996;Gibson et al, 2011;Kong et al, 2014), Eq. (A1) can be expressed in terms of the saturation vapor pressure p sat,s over the ice sample surfaces, yielding for the particle mass growth rate…”
Section: Appendix A: Nanoparticle Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These measurements typically employed a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) and/or a quartz crystal microbalance to measure desorption rates. Desorption rates can be used to infer saturation vapor pressures under the well-supported assumption that the sticking coefficient for water molecules on water ice is unity at these temperatures (Batista et al, 2005;Brown et al, 1996;Gibson et al, 2011;Kong et al, 2014). Measuring water vapor desorption rates at the temperatures under investigation is a challenging task and previous experiments were influenced by contamination issues, showed a very large degree of scattering in the data or yielded unphysically low vapor pressures below that of ice I h (Bryson et al, 1974;Fraser et al, 2001;La Spisa et al, 2001).…”
Section: Comparison To Literature Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that control of bulk accommodation lies not at the interface between the QLL and vapor but at the ice‐like/quasi‐liquid interface. Indeed, a two‐stage kinetic scheme embodying these ideas has been demonstrated to successfully account for accommodation measurements across a wide range of temperatures [ Kong , ; Kong et al , ]. Bolstering this view is evidence that the development and propagation of steps is facet‐specific; i.e., they are processes that are sensitive to the symmetry of the underlying facet [ Libbrecht , , , ; Libbrecht and Rickerby , ]; this implies microscopic influence over those processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%