2010
DOI: 10.1039/c002304n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water 1H relaxation dispersion analysis on a nitroxide radical provides information on the maximal signal enhancement in Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization experiments

Abstract: Water (1)H relaxation rate measurements of (15)N-(2)H-TEMPONE solutions at temperatures ranging from 298 to 328 K have been performed as a function of magnetic field from 0.00023 to 9.4 T, corresponding to (1)H Larmor frequencies of 0.01 to 400 MHz. The relaxation profiles were analyzed according to the full theory for dipolar and contact relaxation, and used to estimate the coupling factor responsible for observed solution DNP effects. The experimental DNP enhancement at (1)H Larmor frequency of 15 MHz obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
129
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(59 reference statements)
12
129
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The coupling factor calculated from the experiments at the three different concentrations amounts to 0.33 AE 0.02, and is independent of concentration as expected. This value is in agreement with the coupling factors derived by nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (0.33-0.35) 21 and with molecular dynamics simulations (0.30). 22 We conclude that pulsed ELDOR provides the suitable approach to evaluate the saturation factors for DNP in liquid solution.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coupling factor calculated from the experiments at the three different concentrations amounts to 0.33 AE 0.02, and is independent of concentration as expected. This value is in agreement with the coupling factors derived by nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (0.33-0.35) 21 and with molecular dynamics simulations (0.30). 22 We conclude that pulsed ELDOR provides the suitable approach to evaluate the saturation factors for DNP in liquid solution.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using these values for e, the effective saturation factors s eff and the leakage factors f from ref. 21, we have evaluated the coupling factor x from the Overhauser equation (1), as summarized in Table 1. The coupling factor calculated from the experiments at the three different concentrations amounts to 0.33 AE 0.02, and is independent of concentration as expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of τ accessible by ODNP at ω e = 9.8 GHz covers the dynamic range for hydration water surrounding solvent-exposed sites, as well as to some extent buried sites of proteins and other biomacromolecules (33). To qualitatively compare the hydration dynamics in different biological environments, we define the retardation factor of hydration dynamics, ρ t = 〈τ〉/τ bulk , which is the average translational correlation time of the local hydration water around a tethered spin label divided by that of bulk water (i.e., τ bulk = 33 ps, measured by ODNP at 0.35 T using a small nitroxide radical dissolved in water) (30,46). As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Approach To Quantify Local Hydration Dynamics At Biomolecularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) describes the major effect of temperature on the DNP enhancement: with increasing temperature, both D S and D R will increase, therefore shortening s t and increasing the DNP enhancement e. Additionally, the temperature dependence of the relaxation rates of the electron and nuclear spin might change the saturation factor s and leakage factor f. In this work, we measured the DNP enhancements of water protons with Fremy's Salt as radicals for temperatures between 15 and 65°C at a magnetic field of 9.2 T. So far, such temperature measurements were done and discussed only up to magnetic fields of B = 3.4 T [14,15]. The high enhancements obtained are compared with predictions based on classical Overhauser theory for liquids, taking translational correlation times extracted from low-field DNP and NMRD experiments [16][17][18][19][20], and calculations of the coupling factor from MD simulations [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%