2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watchful waiting care or early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Where we are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical presentations in these patients involves atypical manifestations of diseases, concomitance of several diseases (comorbidities) and subclinical disease, present in approximately 40% of those aged >65 years. 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical presentations in these patients involves atypical manifestations of diseases, concomitance of several diseases (comorbidities) and subclinical disease, present in approximately 40% of those aged >65 years. 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with severe aortic stenosis considered for intervention, it has been suggested that up to one-third of patients were erroneously classified as asymptomatic. [ 5 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the low 1% operative mortality (3.3% in a large US database), the rate of sudden death (2.6% per year) in the conservative treatment group also tops that of Austrian AS patients with a prospective close follow-up (0.4% per year in those with peak aortic jet velocity ≥4m/s and 0.8% per year in those with ≥5.5 m/s). 2 Taniguchi et al 3 reported a yearly 1% sudden death rate in a large retrospective registry of asymptomatic AS patients with a less stringent follow-up. For a safe watchful waiting strategy, serial exercise testing (ET) needs to be included in the work-up of asymptomatic AS patients to ascertain status in routine practice.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%