2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater treatment by membrane distillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases, wetting across the whole membrane thickness was reported, which has been seen in PTFE and PVDF membranes, evidenced by the presence of salt crystals at various depths of the membrane's cross section [24,102]. Pore wetting may degrade the performance of the MD process either because it reduces the interface for evaporation and therefore the production of vapor, or because, once a pore is wetted, saline water may flow through and contaminate the distillate [24,59,57,102,112,113].…”
Section: Wetting and Permeate Water Quality Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other cases, wetting across the whole membrane thickness was reported, which has been seen in PTFE and PVDF membranes, evidenced by the presence of salt crystals at various depths of the membrane's cross section [24,102]. Pore wetting may degrade the performance of the MD process either because it reduces the interface for evaporation and therefore the production of vapor, or because, once a pore is wetted, saline water may flow through and contaminate the distillate [24,59,57,102,112,113].…”
Section: Wetting and Permeate Water Quality Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe protein fouling was observed at temperatures higher than 20-38°C for aqueous solutions containing organic compounds at representative concentrations (i.e., wastewater, NOM, bovine serum albumin, etc.) [30,84,102] but it was practically absent at lower temperatures [103]. Notably, hydrophobic surfaces show an especially high tendency to get fouled by proteins [104], making MD membranes problematic for waters containing proteins, amino sugars or polysaccharides [105].…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment with HCl acid to reduce the pH value and limit the precipitation of carbonates was not necessary [35]. However, Gryta, et al [68] observed a high decline of the permeate flux due to the blockage of the membrane pores when wastewater was concentrated in salts up to 48.9 g/L (mainly NaCl in presence of other salts like Mg, K and Ca) [68]. The effect of the salts crystallization on pore wetting was detected by Gryta [33,69] who found a significant wetting of pores in the presence of CaCO 3 crystals when treating water containing organic matter (TDS = 409-430 mg·L −1 , TOC = 6.8-8.5 mg·L −1 ).…”
Section: Inorganic Foulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other separation operations, MD has obvious advantages: almost a complete rejection of dissolved and non-volatile species, lower operating pressure than pressuredriven membrane processes, reduced vapour space compared to traditional distillation, low operating temperature of a feed enables the utilization of waste heat as a preferable energy source [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Although the MD technology has the advantages that other membrane technologies have not, one of main obstacles impeding the implementation of MD is membrane fouling, which is caused by interactions between the membrane and the various components during the process [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%