Abstract:Wastewater management in developing countries is a challenge, especially in small towns with rapid population growth. This study aims at assessing the performance and management of five treatment plants (TPs) in rural areas of Cochabamba, Bolivia. Pollutants' concentrations, wastewater flows, hydraulic and organic loads and hydraulic retention times were determined in three small treatment plants (2000-10,000 population equivalent [p.e.]; flow > 432 m/d) and two very small treatment plants (<2000 p.e.; flow < … Show more
“…The O&M of WWTPs was scored based on five indicators (Table 2): (i) required level and availability of technical expertise needed for optimal O&M of the specific WWTP, (ii) required O&M activities and frequency in pre-treatment, which is critical for following processes to work optimally, (iii) required regular O&M activities to ensure WWTP functionality, (iv) long-term maintenance activities in the main process units, e.g. important repairs or replacements and (v) a monitoring system that can support optimal O&M, since lack of monitoring is often a key issue in small-scale WWTPs (Cossio et al 2017).…”
Section: Criterion 3: Operation and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases 4-I and 5-I, with Imhoff tanks, performed poorly in all management criteria. They are designed to reduce the concentration of TSS by up to 50% and BOD by up to 35% (Cossio et al 2017), but this not occurring, probably due to the lack of O&M activities. The Imhoff tank technology is also not sufficient to meet health-based targets for reuse of effluents in agriculture.…”
Section: Management Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive literature about available treatment processes with high removal efficiencies of both pathogens and nutrients from wastewater, but comparison and selection of such upgrades were outside the scope of this study. However, the local resources available in terms of technical expertise and financial resources should be part of the decision-making processes on WWTP upgrading, so that the chosen technology can be operated at its full potential (Cossio et al 2017). It is also important that the treatment process is designed with the safe use of the effluent for irrigation purposes as a design criterion.…”
Section: Alternatives For Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both lack of financial and technical resources in developing countries are major challenges for implementing wastewater treatment strategies, monitoring to identify insufficient treatment plants and hampering sustainable operation (Massoud et al 2009;Qadir et al 2010;Noyola et al 2012). The major issues affecting sustainable functioning of small-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in developing countries are inappropriate design or selection of technology (Bdour et al 2007;Brissaud 2007;Massoud et al 2009;Mara 2013), poor operation and maintenance (Singhirunnusorn and Stenstrom 2009;Noyola et al 2012), lack of technical expertise (Ujang and Buckley 2002;Noyola et al 2012) and lack of monitoring (Massoud et al 2009;Cossio et al 2017). Recognizing the complexity of the situation, the WHO has proposed an approach in which several risk management alternatives (conventional and non-conventional) are compared in terms of risk outcomes and feasibility of their implementation (WHO 2006).…”
Wastewater irrigation is a common practice in developing countries due to water scarcity and increasing demand for food production. However, there are health risks and ecological risks associated with this practice. Small-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) intend to decrease these risks but still face management challenges. This study assessed how the management status of five small-scale WWTPs in Cochabamba, Bolivia affects health risks associated with consumption of lettuce and ecological risks due to the accumulation of nutrients in the soil for lettuce and maize crops. Risk simulations for three wastewater irrigation scenarios were: raw wastewater, actual effluent and expected effluent. Results showed that weak O&M practices can increase risk outcomes to higher levels than irrigating with raw wastewater. Improving O&M to achieve optimal functioning of small-scale WWTPs can reduce human health risks and ecological risks up to 2 log 10 DALY person −1 year −1 and to 2 log 10 kg nitrogen ha −1 accumulated in soil, respectively.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…The O&M of WWTPs was scored based on five indicators (Table 2): (i) required level and availability of technical expertise needed for optimal O&M of the specific WWTP, (ii) required O&M activities and frequency in pre-treatment, which is critical for following processes to work optimally, (iii) required regular O&M activities to ensure WWTP functionality, (iv) long-term maintenance activities in the main process units, e.g. important repairs or replacements and (v) a monitoring system that can support optimal O&M, since lack of monitoring is often a key issue in small-scale WWTPs (Cossio et al 2017).…”
Section: Criterion 3: Operation and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases 4-I and 5-I, with Imhoff tanks, performed poorly in all management criteria. They are designed to reduce the concentration of TSS by up to 50% and BOD by up to 35% (Cossio et al 2017), but this not occurring, probably due to the lack of O&M activities. The Imhoff tank technology is also not sufficient to meet health-based targets for reuse of effluents in agriculture.…”
Section: Management Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive literature about available treatment processes with high removal efficiencies of both pathogens and nutrients from wastewater, but comparison and selection of such upgrades were outside the scope of this study. However, the local resources available in terms of technical expertise and financial resources should be part of the decision-making processes on WWTP upgrading, so that the chosen technology can be operated at its full potential (Cossio et al 2017). It is also important that the treatment process is designed with the safe use of the effluent for irrigation purposes as a design criterion.…”
Section: Alternatives For Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both lack of financial and technical resources in developing countries are major challenges for implementing wastewater treatment strategies, monitoring to identify insufficient treatment plants and hampering sustainable operation (Massoud et al 2009;Qadir et al 2010;Noyola et al 2012). The major issues affecting sustainable functioning of small-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in developing countries are inappropriate design or selection of technology (Bdour et al 2007;Brissaud 2007;Massoud et al 2009;Mara 2013), poor operation and maintenance (Singhirunnusorn and Stenstrom 2009;Noyola et al 2012), lack of technical expertise (Ujang and Buckley 2002;Noyola et al 2012) and lack of monitoring (Massoud et al 2009;Cossio et al 2017). Recognizing the complexity of the situation, the WHO has proposed an approach in which several risk management alternatives (conventional and non-conventional) are compared in terms of risk outcomes and feasibility of their implementation (WHO 2006).…”
Wastewater irrigation is a common practice in developing countries due to water scarcity and increasing demand for food production. However, there are health risks and ecological risks associated with this practice. Small-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) intend to decrease these risks but still face management challenges. This study assessed how the management status of five small-scale WWTPs in Cochabamba, Bolivia affects health risks associated with consumption of lettuce and ecological risks due to the accumulation of nutrients in the soil for lettuce and maize crops. Risk simulations for three wastewater irrigation scenarios were: raw wastewater, actual effluent and expected effluent. Results showed that weak O&M practices can increase risk outcomes to higher levels than irrigating with raw wastewater. Improving O&M to achieve optimal functioning of small-scale WWTPs can reduce human health risks and ecological risks up to 2 log 10 DALY person −1 year −1 and to 2 log 10 kg nitrogen ha −1 accumulated in soil, respectively.
ARTICLE HISTORY
“…India is experiencing an exponential growth in last few decades, in the population as well as in economic / industrial growth. Due to the above scenarios the available centralized treatment facilities are showing an abysmal performance and hence the ground water and surface water sources are highly contaminated (Cossio et al, 2018).…”
The increasing need of water and depleting availability of water resources pressed the research world look for an alternative solution by treating the wastewater discharged from domestic dwellings for secondary reuse. It has proved to be an effective way to overcome this problem. The improper functioning of centralized treatment systems and huge cost involved for the operation and maintenance paved a way for the Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS). In the present study, two treatment approaches were evaluated in detail. Constructed wetlands and MBBR, for a residential complex in Rural and Urban sectors respectively. The systems are designed with the help of quantifiable data including the population, area available and various chemical properties of the wastewater discharged. The performance of the systems were monitored for a period of time and showed a good quality water that can be used for secondary applications like toilet flushing or gardening.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.