2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-011-0385-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waste-to-energy technologies in continuous process industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. 21,[29][30][31][32] Unlike the COSS, the charging shaft is located directly above the melting furnace, but the scrap charge is not continuous and employs a unique scrap-retaining system with water-cooled fingers. The operational temperatures for scrap preheating have reached 773 K (500°C) and higher depending on the type and size of the scrap charge used and the degree of postcombustion.…”
Section: Vertical Shaft Scrap Preheating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. 21,[29][30][31][32] Unlike the COSS, the charging shaft is located directly above the melting furnace, but the scrap charge is not continuous and employs a unique scrap-retaining system with water-cooled fingers. The operational temperatures for scrap preheating have reached 773 K (500°C) and higher depending on the type and size of the scrap charge used and the degree of postcombustion.…”
Section: Vertical Shaft Scrap Preheating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important considerations include reductions in energy consumption and associated costs, while simultaneously stemming harmful pollutant releases. Ideally, wastewater treatment facilities would produce clean water effluent, operate at net-plus energy, and have near-zero pollutant releases to the environment (Münster & Lund, 2010;Villar et al, 2012;Weismantel, 1996). Currently, wastewater treatment facilities do produce clean water, but only at immense energetic and environmental expense.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other options such as electricity generation, cooling through absorption chillers and heat pumps were found to be less economical. Villar et al (2012) analysed technologies for excess energy recovery in continuous process industries, with the focus on the iron and steel industry. Options for excess heat recovery presented were: excess heat to DHS, coke dry quenching (CDQ) to recover heat for on-site use or electricity generation, recuperation system in the BF, regenerative burners in furnaces, exhaust gas cooling system with steam recovery boiler, and scrap preheating.…”
Section: Recovery Of Industrial Excess Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%