2015
DOI: 10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i1/36-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Washback of English National Examination in the Indonesian Context

Abstract: This study examines how teachers teach English to prepare students for high-stakes English national examination in the Indonesian context. Data were collected from two high-achieving and three low-achieving schools with eleven teachers as the subjects of in-depth interviews and nonparticipatory classroom observations. The findings reveal that bi-directional washback was found in both groups of schools. The schools of low achievers were found to have more intensive negative washback than those of high achievers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They mentioned that the schools and parents had very high expectations about the students' scores in English national examination, so teaching became very stressful. This is reasonable as even for more experienced teachers, preparing students for the high-stakes English national examination in the Indonesian context was burdensome that washback effects were found, for example, in the research conducted by Furaidah, Saukah, and Widiati (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They mentioned that the schools and parents had very high expectations about the students' scores in English national examination, so teaching became very stressful. This is reasonable as even for more experienced teachers, preparing students for the high-stakes English national examination in the Indonesian context was burdensome that washback effects were found, for example, in the research conducted by Furaidah, Saukah, and Widiati (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Conversely, it disadvantages the teachers and students. Firstly, this high-stake test makes the teacher teach for the test covering listening and reading skills only (Furaidah, Saukah, & Widiati, 2015;Lie, 2007;Sukyadi & Mardiani, 2011). In addition, it is unfair for the students to take the same test regardless different curricula they experience (Putra, 2014;Depdiknas, 2007;Kemdikbud, 2016b).…”
Section: Assessment Carried Out By the Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they may use to name their method. Furaidah, Saukah, and Widiati (2015) reported that teachers spent most of their time drilling their students in answering listening and reading multiple-choice questions and disregarding the other skills, speaking and writing, as the consequences of the high-stakes tests. These authors reveal that the teachers rely heavily on past papers which contain English multiple-choice exercises (listening and reading) and commercial exam-related publications in preparing students for the English National Examination (ENE).…”
Section: Societal Classroom Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%