Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warping time for more effective real-time crowdsourcing

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce the idea of "warping time" to improve crowd performance on the difficult task of captioning speech in real-time. Prior work has shown that the crowd can collectively caption speech in real-time by merging the partial results of multiple workers. Because non-expert workers cannot keep up with natural speaking rates, the task is frustrating and prone to errors as workers buffer what they hear to type later. The TimeWarp approach automatically increases and decreases the speed of speec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. We have also shown that by systematically slowing down and speeding up the audio for individual workers we can improve both precision and recall by more than 10% [2]. This is the TimeWarp approach to real-time human computation.…”
Section: Legion Scribementioning
confidence: 73%
“…To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. We have also shown that by systematically slowing down and speeding up the audio for individual workers we can improve both precision and recall by more than 10% [2]. This is the TimeWarp approach to real-time human computation.…”
Section: Legion Scribementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Finally, recent work in crowdsourcing has focused on providing fast response times on tasks (Bernstein et al 2011;Lasecki et al 2013), with focus problems such as quality control (Mashhadi and Capra 2011). Thus, we consider that one key advantage our work has over expert-sourced suggestions is that it provides shorter response times, with a significant part of the suggestion process automated by topic and suggestion generation algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cheering case however, the support has to happen at a specific time and workers have to 'sync' with the event rather then vice versa. Related work is found in studies on crowd-powered interfaces with highly innovative techniques for crowdsourcing just-in-time work such as VizWiz -a system for crowdsourcing near real-time support for vision impaired [7], Lasecki et al's ingenious work for captioning live speech [20] and Bernstein et al's work on queuing workers using multiple queuing models [4]. However, with the exception of Morris et al's work on 'Crowdsourcing Collective Emotional Intelligence' [22], there is very little knowledge on crowdsourcing spectator support.…”
Section: Real-time Factormentioning
confidence: 99%