2016
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Warm-Season (C4) Turfgrass Genotypes Resistant to Spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae)

Abstract: Screening for resistance to insect pests is one of the early stages of grass breeding programs. Pasture spittlebugs are sap-sucking insects that potentially cause severe damage to turfgrasses, including the loss of functional quality and perenniallity. The Brazilian flora has a large number of grass species with wide morphological variability and adaptability to different soil and climate conditions that can potentially be used as lawns. However, no study has screened turfgrass genotypes for resistance to spit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This forage grass has relevant agronomic attributes, including exceptional adaptation to poor and acidic soils that are typical of the tropics, leading to good animal performance (Valle et al, 2010). However, the species is susceptible to several types of spittlebug, including Notozulia entreriana Berg (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), which is the most damaging pest for tropical pastures (Gusmão et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This forage grass has relevant agronomic attributes, including exceptional adaptation to poor and acidic soils that are typical of the tropics, leading to good animal performance (Valle et al, 2010). However, the species is susceptible to several types of spittlebug, including Notozulia entreriana Berg (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), which is the most damaging pest for tropical pastures (Gusmão et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spittlebugs reduce biomass production, decrease palatability, and reduce the carrying capacity of pastures (Valério and Nakano, 1988). N. entreriana nymphs constantly suck the sap of roots, causing yellowing of the plant, and the saliva of the adults induces phytotoxemia that causes plant death (Valério and Nakano, 1992; Gusmão et al, 2016). Therefore, breeding programs aim to develop new cultivars with reasonable or high resistance to spittlebugs to reduce forage loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of difference on herbage yield in the latter study may be related to short period of infestation. In addition, the magnitude of differences on herbage yield reported in the literature may be due to spittlebug population density, host plant resistance, growth factor availability, and infestation period 20,21,40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, studies about pest science on forage systems are scarce compared to agricultural crops. The little information available has also been focused on plant resistance and genetic traits to support breeding programs 40,44 and there is a knowledge gap on quantifying animal productivity losses caused by spittlebugs. The quantification of damage caused by pests is one of most important aspects to outline strategies of control and there are no fundamentals to define economic threshold levels with no understanding of the relation between number of insects and crop yield 45 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flavopicta (Stal) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) (Gusmão et al, 2016) and Deois spp. To improve spittlebug resistance, the breeder can either select directly in an intraspecific population or start an interspecific population by performing crosses with resistant cultivars such as U. brizantha cv.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%