2006
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/2/022201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wall thickness dependence of the scaling law for ferroic stripe domains

Abstract: The periodicity of 180 • stripe domains as a function of crystal thickness scales with the width of the domain walls, both for ferroelectric and for ferromagnetic materials. Here we derive an analytical expression for the generalized ferroic scaling factor and use this to calculate the domain wall thickness and gradient coefficients (exchange constants) in some ferroelectric and ferromagnetic materials. We then use these to discuss some of the wider implications for the physics of ferroelectric nanodevices and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(62 reference statements)
5
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation is also useful in that it can be used in reverse in order to estimate the domain wall thickness of any ferroic with well-defined boundary conditions (Catalan et al, 2007a). Indirect versions of it have been calculated for the specific case of ferroelectrics (Lines and Glass, 2004;De Guerville et al, 2005), but in fact Eq.…”
Section: Wall Thickness and Universality Of Kittel's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation is also useful in that it can be used in reverse in order to estimate the domain wall thickness of any ferroic with well-defined boundary conditions (Catalan et al, 2007a). Indirect versions of it have been calculated for the specific case of ferroelectrics (Lines and Glass, 2004;De Guerville et al, 2005), but in fact Eq.…”
Section: Wall Thickness and Universality Of Kittel's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S10). ω should scale with the total crystal thickness along its polar axis, D, as ω = a · D γ , where a is a prefactor that depends on the domain-wall thickness and γ is theoretically 0.5 (42,43) and empirically between ∼0.4 and 0.6 (67)(68)(69). By relating ω to D from several single crystals (without grain boundaries; SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Applied Physical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, equivalent data for domains in other ferroic systems (ferroelectric or ferromagnetic) are included. Ferroelectric domains are generally smaller than ferromagnetic domains [18][19][20][21], but the ferroelectric domains in BFO are noticeably bigger, and close to the domain size of magnetic Co. This suggests a higher energy cost of the domain walls [21,22], consistent with a strong magnetoelectric coupling at the wall [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferroelectric domains are generally smaller than ferromagnetic domains [18][19][20][21], but the ferroelectric domains in BFO are noticeably bigger, and close to the domain size of magnetic Co. This suggests a higher energy cost of the domain walls [21,22], consistent with a strong magnetoelectric coupling at the wall [6]. This contrasts with the apparently low intrinsic magnetoelectric coupling of the bulk material [23], and underlines the interest of domain walls as multiferroic entities in their own right [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%